THE EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL TYRANNY IN THE UNITED STATES:

"If the judges interpret the laws themselves, and suffer none else to interpret, they may easily make, of the laws, [a shredded] shipman's hose!" - King James I of England, around 1616.

“No class of the community ought to be allowed freer scope in the expression or publication of opinions as to the capacity, impartiality or integrity of judges than members of the bar. They have the best opportunities of observing and forming a correct judgment. They are in constant attendance on the courts. Hundreds of those who are called on to vote never enter a court-house, or if they do, it is only at intervals as jurors, witnesses or parties. To say that an attorney can only act or speak on this subject under liability to be called to account and to be deprived of his profession and livelihood by the very judge or judges whom he may consider it his duty to attack and expose, is a position too monstrous to be entertained for a moment under our present system,” Justice Sharwood in Ex Parte Steinman and Hensel, 95 Pa 220, 238-39 (1880).

“This case illustrates to me the serious consequences to the Bar itself of not affording the full protections of the First Amendment to its applicants for admission. For this record shows that [the rejected attorney candidate] has many of the qualities that are needed in the American Bar. It shows not only that [the rejected attorney candidate] has followed a high moral, ethical and patriotic course in all of the activities of his life, but also that he combines these more common virtues with the uncommon virtue of courage to stand by his principles at any cost.

It is such men as these who have most greatly honored the profession of the law. The legal profession will lose much of its nobility and its glory if it is not constantly replenished with lawyers like these. To force the Bar to become a group of thoroughly orthodox, time-serving, government-fearing individuals is to humiliate and degrade it.” In Re Anastaplo, 18 Ill. 2d 182, 163 N.E.2d 429 (1959), cert. granted, 362 U.S. 968 (1960), affirmed over strong dissent, 366 U.S. 82 (1961), Justice Black, Chief Justice Douglas and Justice Brennan, dissenting.

" I do not believe that the practice of law is a "privilege" which empowers Government to deny lawyers their constitutional rights. The mere fact that a lawyer has important responsibilities in society does not require or even permit the State to deprive him of those protections of freedom set out in the Bill of Rights for the precise purpose of insuring the independence of the individual against the Government and those acting for the Government”. Lathrop v Donohue, 367 US 820 (1961), Justice Black, dissenting.

"The legal profession must take great care not to emulate the many occupational groups that have managed to convert licensure from a sharp weapon of public defense into blunt instrument of self-enrichment". Walter Gellhorn, "The Abuse of Occupational Licensing", University of Chicago Law Review, Volume 44 Issue 1, September of 1976.

“Because the law requires that judges no matter how corrupt, who do not act in the clear absence of jurisdiction while performing a judicial act, are immune from suit, former Judge Ciavarella will escape liability for the vast majority of his conduct in this action. This is, to be sure, against the popular will, but it is the very oath which he is alleged to have so indecently, cavalierly, baselessly and willfully violated for personal gain that requires this Court to find him immune from suit”, District Judge A. Richard Caputo in H.T., et al, v. Ciavarella, Jr, et al, Case No. 3:09-cv-00286-ARC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Document 336, page 18, November 20, 2009. This is about judges who were sentencing kids to juvenile detention for kickbacks.


Wednesday, October 14, 2026

THE CHRONICLES OF SIR McBRIDUS 📜💀😂 Part IV: 👻💀🐌 THE SLIME REMEMBERS 🟢🐌😱🤣 - A psychiatric emergency at 🏰🦇👹 Chenangus Slimery Castle 🐌🤢⚖️💥

 

Read Part I here, Part II here and Part III here.


The morning began disastrously.

Sir Marcus Josephus McBridus Snailius, Custos Slimi, Knight of the Perpetually Slippery Robe, was discovered beneath his judicial desk, attempting to bury a newspaper in seventeen gallons of freshly secreted slime.

“OUTRAGE!” he shrieked. “SCANDAL! JOURNALISM!”

His valet, a modest earthworm named Wrigglesworth, cautiously approached.

“Your Judicial Viscosity, perhaps another application of sanctions?”

“BWOMP-YA!”

A magnificent fountain of slime struck the ceiling.

“Summon Dr. Gaston Slug! IMMEDIATELY!”

I. A Medical Emergency

Dr. Gaston Slug, distinguished Director of the Institute of Molluscan Behavioral Therapy, arrived seventeen hours later, having traveled at maximum clinical speed.

He found his celebrated patient clinging upside down to a portrait of Lady Justice.

“Marcus! My finest therapeutic achievement! What has happened?”

“THEY FOUND OUT!”

“Found out what?”

“THAT I WAS A DISTRICT ATTORNEY!”

Dr. Slug blinked.

“Marcus, your previous employment was never classified.”

“BUT THEY ARE READING ABOUT IT!  THAT I WAS A DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN A CASE RELATED TO NERONI V MOLE AND NERONI V DELAWARE COUNTY!!!! WHERE I JUST SANCTIONED THEM SUA SPONTE EX PARTE FOR STATING..... STATING... STATING...  WHAT THEY NOW KNOW WAS TRUE - AND MORE!!!!!!  AND THEY KNOW I HAD TO DISCLOSE MY DA'S INVOLVEMENT! AND I DID NOT!!!”

“Ah,” murmured Dr. Slug. “A much more serious condition.”

He produced his diagnostic manual, The International Classification of Molluscan Disorders, and opened it to Chapter 13: Pathological Public Accountability.

“Tell me everything.”

“LAUGHMAN!”

“Bless you.”

“NERONI V. MOLÉ!”

“Gesundheit.”

“NERONI V. DELAWARE COUNTY!”

Dr. Slug dropped his lettuce.

“Good heavens, Marcus. Three consecutive exposures to the public record! How have you survived?”

“BY SANCTIONING PEOPLE!”

“Naturally. But apparently your dosage has become insufficient.”

II. The Terrible Discovery

Sir McBridus crawled down the portrait, leaving a translucent trail across Lady Justice's blindfold.

“They have been looking into the Laughman affair, Gaston!”

“Dreadful.”

“They have been examining what happened when I was District Attorney!”

“Barbaric.”

“They have been connecting it to the litigation!”

“Unscientific.”

“AND THEY ARE PUBLISHING IT!”

Dr. Slug gasped.

“Publishing? Without your permission?”

“WITHOUT EVEN ASKING ME WHETHER I CONSIDER IT FRIVOLOUS!”

The psychiatrist closed his eyes.

“This is worse than I feared.”

He began dictating his clinical observations.

Patient presents with acute historical exposure, accompanied by involuntary judicial secretions, catastrophic loss of narrative control, and recurrent attacks of BWOMP-YA.

“Marcus, when you became a judge, did you believe your prosecutorial history would cease to exist?”

“OF COURSE!”

“Why?”

“BECAUSE I AM A JUDGE!”

Dr. Slug smiled tenderly.

“Excellent. Your original treatment remains effective. Your cognitive defenses are intact.”

“THEN WHY AM I SUFFERING?”

“Because, Marcus, although we successfully removed your capacity to recognize inconvenient facts, we neglected to remove the facts themselves.”

There was a terrible silence.

Then:

“BWOOOOOMP-YAAAA!”

Three windows shattered. The court reporter drowned in metaphorical mucus.

III. The Forbidden Word

Dr. Slug decided to administer a psychological association test.

“Marcus, I shall say a word. You tell me the first thing that comes to mind.”

“Proceed.”

“Evidence.”

“FRIVOLOUS!”

“Newspaper.”

“SANCTIONS!”

“History.”

“DISMISSED!”

“Litigant.”

“VEXATIOUS!”

“Appeal.”

“MORE SANCTIONS!”

“Recusal.”

Sir McBridus turned pale green.

His eyestalks crossed.

His judicial foot contracted.

A thin stream of slime escaped beneath his robe.

“DOCTOR! YOU KNOW THAT WORD IS FORBIDDEN!”

Dr. Slug immediately administered two emergency lettuce leaves.

“Forgive me, Marcus. I momentarily forgot your constitutional intolerance to self-examination.”

IV. The Slime Defense

After forty minutes of intensive molluscan psychotherapy, Dr. Slug proposed a treatment.

“We shall construct a protective shell of judicial immunity.”

“ABSOLUTE?”

“Absolutely.”

“RETROACTIVE?”

“Psychologically, certainly.”

“WILL IT COVER MY DISTRICT ATTORNEY YEARS?”

Dr. Slug hesitated.

“Marcus, judicial immunity is a legal doctrine. It cannot change the chronology of your employment.”

“THEN CHANGE THE CHRONOLOGY!”

“How?”

“ISSUE AN ORDER!”

“Against time?”

“IF NECESSARY!”

The psychiatrist made another entry:

Patient exhibits advanced temporal jurisdictional grandiosity. Believes calendar subject to judicial discretion.

“Marcus, there are certain limitations to the power of an order.”

“NAME ONE!”

“Yesterday.”

Sir McBridus screamed.

V. The Fatal Complication

“Doctor,” whispered Sir McBridus, “suppose they continue investigating Laughman?”

Dr. Slug adjusted his spectacles.

“They might.”

“And the prosecutorial records?”

“They might examine those too.”

“And Neroni v. Molé?”

“Possibly.”

“And Neroni v. Delaware County?”

“Indeed.”

“And suppose they put everything together?”

The psychiatrist contemplated the question for a very long time.

“Marcus, I fear you are experiencing a condition never before documented in molluscan medicine.”

“WHAT CONDITION?”

“Continuity.”

“IS IT FATAL?”

“To certain narratives, yes.”

Sir McBridus collapsed into a puddle.

“BUT I HAVE ISSUED ORDERS!”

“Yes.”

“I HAVE IMPOSED SANCTIONS!”

“Yes.”

“I HAVE DECLARED PEOPLE FRIVOLOUS!”

“Repeatedly.”

“WHAT MORE COULD A SNAIL POSSIBLY DO?”

Dr. Slug sighed.

“You could answer the questions.”

Sir McBridus emitted a noise resembling a judicial opinion being sucked through a clogged drain.

VI. The Doctor's Final Report

That evening, Dr. Gaston Slug submitted his confidential psychiatric report to the Institute of Molluscan Behavioral Therapy.

Patient: Sir Marcus Josephus McBridus Snailius, Custos Slimi.

Diagnosis: Acute Public Record Exposure Syndrome, Stage IV, with recurrent sanctions reflex and severe chronological incompatibility.

Prognosis: Guarded. Patient remains capable of producing extraordinary quantities of slime. Unfortunately, the slime has demonstrated no capacity to dissolve public records, suppress independent journalism, or reverse the passage of time.

Recommended treatment: Complete isolation from newspapers, docket sheets, archival records, historical chronology, and persons capable of reading.

Contraindications: Facts. Questions. Dates. Documents. Journalists. Litigants. The First Amendment.

Emergency intervention: In the event of further exposure, patient should immediately retreat into his shell and repeat the therapeutic affirmation:

“I am the Court. I am the Court. I am the Court.”

Special warning: Under no circumstances should the patient be informed that the Court itself has a record.

EPILOGUE: THE UNFORTUNATE NEWSPAPER

At midnight, Wrigglesworth entered the consulting chamber.

“Your Judicial Viscosity, there is another article.”

Sir McBridus trembled.

“About whom?”

“You, sir.”

“WHAT DOES IT SAY?”

“That the public is entitled to know.”

Sir McBridus turned toward his psychiatrist.

“GASTON! WHAT IS THE MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT?”

Dr. Slug slowly withdrew into his shell.

From deep within came his muffled professional opinion:

“Marcus, I am afraid it is incurable.”

And from Chenangus Slimery Castle rose the most magnificent judicial eruption ever recorded in the annals of molluscan psychiatry.

BWOOOOOOOOOMP-YAAAAAAAAAAAA!

The slime reached the chandelier.

The chandelier fell.

The newspaper remained perfectly legible.



TO BE CONTINUED...

Episode V: THE PEOPLE v. YESTERDAY — Sir McBridus Attempts to Sanction the Calendar.

The Chronicles of Sir McBridus is a work of political and judicial satire. Its molluscan characters, psychiatric diagnoses, dialogue, and supernatural judicial powers are fictional.

No comments:

Post a Comment