THE EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL TYRANNY IN THE UNITED STATES:

"If the judges interpret the laws themselves, and suffer none else to interpret, they may easily make, of the laws, [a shredded] shipman's hose!" - King James I of England, around 1616.

“No class of the community ought to be allowed freer scope in the expression or publication of opinions as to the capacity, impartiality or integrity of judges than members of the bar. They have the best opportunities of observing and forming a correct judgment. They are in constant attendance on the courts. Hundreds of those who are called on to vote never enter a court-house, or if they do, it is only at intervals as jurors, witnesses or parties. To say that an attorney can only act or speak on this subject under liability to be called to account and to be deprived of his profession and livelihood by the very judge or judges whom he may consider it his duty to attack and expose, is a position too monstrous to be entertained for a moment under our present system,” Justice Sharwood in Ex Parte Steinman and Hensel, 95 Pa 220, 238-39 (1880).

“This case illustrates to me the serious consequences to the Bar itself of not affording the full protections of the First Amendment to its applicants for admission. For this record shows that [the rejected attorney candidate] has many of the qualities that are needed in the American Bar. It shows not only that [the rejected attorney candidate] has followed a high moral, ethical and patriotic course in all of the activities of his life, but also that he combines these more common virtues with the uncommon virtue of courage to stand by his principles at any cost.

It is such men as these who have most greatly honored the profession of the law. The legal profession will lose much of its nobility and its glory if it is not constantly replenished with lawyers like these. To force the Bar to become a group of thoroughly orthodox, time-serving, government-fearing individuals is to humiliate and degrade it.” In Re Anastaplo, 18 Ill. 2d 182, 163 N.E.2d 429 (1959), cert. granted, 362 U.S. 968 (1960), affirmed over strong dissent, 366 U.S. 82 (1961), Justice Black, Chief Justice Douglas and Justice Brennan, dissenting.

" I do not believe that the practice of law is a "privilege" which empowers Government to deny lawyers their constitutional rights. The mere fact that a lawyer has important responsibilities in society does not require or even permit the State to deprive him of those protections of freedom set out in the Bill of Rights for the precise purpose of insuring the independence of the individual against the Government and those acting for the Government”. Lathrop v Donohue, 367 US 820 (1961), Justice Black, dissenting.

"The legal profession must take great care not to emulate the many occupational groups that have managed to convert licensure from a sharp weapon of public defense into blunt instrument of self-enrichment". Walter Gellhorn, "The Abuse of Occupational Licensing", University of Chicago Law Review, Volume 44 Issue 1, September of 1976.

“Because the law requires that judges no matter how corrupt, who do not act in the clear absence of jurisdiction while performing a judicial act, are immune from suit, former Judge Ciavarella will escape liability for the vast majority of his conduct in this action. This is, to be sure, against the popular will, but it is the very oath which he is alleged to have so indecently, cavalierly, baselessly and willfully violated for personal gain that requires this Court to find him immune from suit”, District Judge A. Richard Caputo in H.T., et al, v. Ciavarella, Jr, et al, Case No. 3:09-cv-00286-ARC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Document 336, page 18, November 20, 2009. This is about judges who were sentencing kids to juvenile detention for kickbacks.


Tuesday, May 26, 2026

On The Benefits Of Fresh Mountain Air






Tourists come to Delaware County for:

  • mountains,
  • rivers,
  • covered bridges,
  • and charming small towns.

What they do not realize is that beneath the picturesque scenery lies a hereditary vampire dynasty with pension benefits.

Observe the evolutionary cycle carefully.

First came Dick Northrup:

  • longtime DA,
  • institutional patriarch,
  • builder of prosecutorial gravity itself.

Under King Dick served loyal ADA John — later to become:

The Hon.  John “The InkPot” Hubbard,

patron saint of racially inappropriate courtroom commentary and future Lord of Family Court.

Then the first metamorphosis occurred.

Dick evolved upward into County Judge.

At which point Hubbard molted seamlessly into DA.

This was not considered unusual in Delaware County because the County already operated under the ancient doctrine:

“Why hire strangers when the same six people can rotate forever?”

Then came the second metamorphosis.

Dick resigned from the bench.

John The InkPot ascended into judgeship.

Shawn Smith became DA.

And Dick — having now:

  • prosecuted felony cases,
  • supervised prosecutors,
  • become judge,
  • left judgeship,
  • and re-entered prosecution —

returned majestically as ADA under Shawn Smith, reportedly presenting grand jury felony matters to:

John The InkPot -

Who had previously served:

  • under Dick,
  • after Dick,
  • and before Dick returned to prosecute before him again.

At this point even the laws of chronology filed for early retirement.

Especially because with him, Dick brought back to DA's office - no, not another Bowie, another Dick - now called the "little Eric" - the Senior Meals hero, the child advocate, the Walton village deputy mayor - and the keeper of the traffic ticket fabrication (or drug forfeiture?) money-pot for the vampire family clan.

This is not a legal system anymore.

This is a Vampire Empire community theater production where all official vampires keeps changing costumes but nobody leaves the stage.  Who would - with such vampire family benefits?

The beauty of the system lies in its efficiency.

Why waste taxpayer resources on:

  • institutional independence,
  • fresh perspectives,
  • or separation of functions,

when the same people can simply:

  • prosecute each other’s cases,
  • replace each other’s offices,
  • supervise each other’s careers,
  • and later preside over one another’s felony presentations?

In larger jurisdictions this might create:

  • ethical panic,
  • newspaper investigations,
  • legislative hearings,
  • or documentaries narrated by exhausted British actors.

In DelCo it creates:

continuity.

And somewhere deep in the mountains, a confused outsider holding a Constitution quietly asks:

“Wait… is this normal?”

At which point the entire County labyrinth turns slowly in unison and replies:

“FRIVOLOUS.”

The Vampire Empire has even more vampire family benefits. 

In most empires, people apply for jobs.

In DelCo, jobs simply migrate through bloodlines like spawning salmon.

The process is elegant.

A Bowie hatches in the Sheriff’s Department, migrates briefly through Probation, mates in a patrol car near DSS, and eventually returns upstream to a County vehicle with lights on top, unscathed.

A Bowie might even slam that patrol vehicle into a citizen or two, throw a facer at a girlfriend - or three, and have their victim put in jail for scratching his shin while being dragged on the floor - why not? 

A Covell would kill a father of two, escape - as royalty should - with a slap on her dainty wrist, morph into a respectable Taggart, assess taxes, sell real estate for a profit she just created by raising taxes, and - briefly, but scandalously - Chair the Royal Repub... oh, Vampire Party dinners.

And so the spawning continues.

A Kelso here and a Kelso there.

A Bishop here and a Bishop - right over there.

A Faulkner here - and a Faulkner here again.

A Moshier here - and a Moshier there.

A big Morgan here - and a vociferous Reihert-Morgan over there. 

Biologists remain baffled.

The County insists this is all coincidence.

Researchers attempting to map the ecosystem were last seen wandering through:

  • WAC,
  • Delaware Opportunities,
  • code enforcement,
  • assessor offices,
  • party meetings,
  • and opioid task-force committees,
    muttering:

“Wait… why is everybody here also over there?”

At the center of the maze sits the ancient DelCo aristocracy, the M&M&M&M Royal Vampire Council.

It reigns.  Magnanimously.  Contentedly.

Because - you know what - the fresh mountain air will take care of all the stink, after all.  

It always does.









Sunday, May 24, 2026

The Court That Loved Squid

 




Far beyond the civilized shores of Ordinary Procedure sailed the once-peaceful litigation universe known as Neroni v. Watershed Agricultural Council, EF2026-106 in New York State Delaware County Supreme Court.  Yes that interesting piece trying to question the happenings in the WAC Castle.

For a while, everything behaved according to the sacred ancient customs:
operative pleadings defined the universe,
parties stayed inside the case,
non-parties stayed outside the case,
and motions generally required at least a faint relationship to jurisdiction.

Then came April 3, 2026.

An Amended Verified Complaint was filed.
Wayne Marshfield vanished from the operative pleading.
Under ordinary laws of civil procedure, he should have peacefully drifted away into the misty afterlife reserved for former litigants.

Instead, something absolutely extraordinary occurred.

The former party mutated into giant procedural sea food.

Soon an enormous litigation squid emerged from the dark waters outside the case universe, waving slimy appendages labeled:
“Motion #2”
“Motion #3”
“Sanctions”
“Anti-Filing Injunction”

The squid had:
no party status,
no standing,
no intervention,
no authority,
and no visible respect for maritime or procedural boundaries.

Naturally, one might expect the Court to say:
“Excuse me, sir, you are a cephalopod outside the litigation.”

But no.

Instead, the squid was welcomed warmly into the procedural ecosystem.

Soon the entire litigation universe began revolving around the highly aggressive calamari.

The actual claims started disappearing beneath its pulsing tentacles.
The operative pleading cracked apart like a doomed sailing vessel.
Facts, evidence, and due process floated helplessly through space like debris after a cosmic shipwreck.

Meanwhile, the Court stood nearby, calmly assisting the creature  while insisting that all of this was perfectly normal litigation management.

At some point, I stopped asking:
“Why is the squid attacking the case?”

and began asking the more important constitutional question:

“Why is the Court taking orders from seafood?”

Thursday, May 21, 2026

The Butterfly Fallout Nobody Voted For

 


The fallout did not come all at once.

That was the problem.

If the Kingdom of Delco had exploded dramatically in a single mushroom cloud, everybody would have noticed immediately.

Sirens.
Fire.
Panic.
Committees.

Instead, the fallout drifted quietly across the hills like invisible dust.

And because it drifted slowly, many villagers did not understand they were already standing inside it.

After the discovery of the Radioactive Butterfly, the Royal Council of Delco held many emergency meetings.

There were solemn speeches.

There were declarations of transparency.

There were press releases assuring the peasants that:
everything was stable;
everything was under control;
and absolutely nobody should panic about glowing butterflies.

Especially statistical ones.

Meanwhile the villagers continued living their ordinary lives.

School budget season arrived.

Across the kingdom, tired villagers walked into school gymnasiums carrying coffee cups, tax bills, and the exhausted expressions of people who had already survived several “temporary fiscal emergencies.”

The villagers loved their schools.

They voted for buses.
They voted for repairs.
They voted for libraries.
They voted for roofs.
They voted for children.

And because good villagers always support education, many budgets passed.

Some by wide margins.

The Royal Council smiled proudly.

“See?” they announced.
“The people support our leadership.”

But there was one small complication.

The villagers had voted without being told about the butterfly.

Nobody explained that somewhere high above the kingdom, radioactive underassessment particles were already drifting silently through the air.

Nobody explained that if giant castles quietly paid less than their proper share into the treasury, then ordinary cottages eventually absorbed the difference.

Nobody explained that fallout does not disappear.

It spreads.

So while villagers applauded school budgets in one building—

in another building, the Department of Royal Social Services quietly announced something fascinating.

Despite endless speeches about crisis:
despite staffing shortages;
despite financial emergencies;
despite declarations that the kingdom was under unbearable strain—

the Department somehow managed to return seven hundred thousand gold coins back into the Royal Fund Balance Vault.

The Royal Treasurer smiled proudly beside the vault.

“Wonderful news,” he declared.

The villagers blinked.

“Wait,” asked one peasant cautiously.

“If there was enough money to return seven hundred thousand gold coins to the treasury…”

“…why are our taxes exploding?”

The Treasurer immediately adjusted his ceremonial necktie.

“That,” he explained gravely, “is a very dangerous question.”

Three committees were formed instantly.

The Committee on Budget Understanding.

The Advisory Panel on Proper Civic Attitudes.

And the Emergency Task Force on Harmful Spreadsheet Activity.

Meanwhile the fallout continued drifting across Delco.

Tiny glowing particles settled gently upon:

school budgets;
property taxes;
road repairs;
ambulance services;
working families;
and exhausted villagers who were repeatedly informed there was “simply no money.”

The strange thing was that the villagers kept hearing two completely different stories at the same time.

Story One:
The kingdom was broke.

Story Two:
The kingdom had enough spare money to quietly place hundreds of thousands of gold coins back into reserve vaults.

The villagers became confused.

Naturally, this was blamed on the butterfly.

“The butterfly creates division,” announced the Royal Public Relations Wizard.

“The butterfly spreads distrust.”

“The butterfly asks arithmetic questions during emotionally sensitive moments.”

Meanwhile the butterfly itself continued glowing silently over the county.

Because butterflies, unlike committees, cannot issue press releases.

And slowly, some villagers began noticing something peculiar.

Every time somebody asked:

“Where exactly is the money going?”

or

“Why are taxes increasing if funds are simultaneously returning to reserves?”

or

“Should voters perhaps have been informed about the radioactive fallout before approving more budgets?”

—the Royal Council reacted as though somebody had released a cobra into the courtroom.

Not because the questions were irrational.

But because radioactive fallout is extremely inconvenient once villagers begin tracing where it lands.

Especially when they discover the fallout always seems to settle upon ordinary people first.

And so the Kingdom entered a new phase of the crisis.

The Radioactive Butterfly Fallout Years.





The Tale of the Radioactive Butterfly of Delco




Once upon a time, deep in the damp green hills of Butterfly Valley, there stood a peculiar little kingdom called Delco.

Delco was famous for four things:

its endless committees;

its endless press releases;

its endless emergency meetings about transparency;

and its supernatural ability to explain why absolutely nothing was ever its fault.

The people of Delco paid taxes faithfully every year and were constantly reassured by the Royal Council:

“Everything is fair.”
“Everything is equal.”
“Everybody’s assessment was raised uniformly by 20%.”
“Please stop looking at spreadsheets.”

Now, far away on the warm southern shores of the Atlantic Ocean, there lived a deeply troublesome creature who maliciously owned property in Delco and even more maliciously paid taxes there for decades.

The creature was not a dragon.
Not a witch.
Not even a currently billing lawyer.

No.

She was much worse.

She was a journalist-statistician-formerly-toiling-lawyer with spreadsheets.

The Royal Council feared spreadsheets more than dragons.

Because dragons merely burned villages.

But spreadsheets compared numbers.

And numbers, unlike dragons, left documentary evidence.

One spring morning, while wandering through the enchanted Royal Tax Forest, the journalist noticed something strange.

The royal assessment graph did not resemble the beautiful straight “uniform 20% path” promised by the Royal Ambassadors from every rooftop in the kingdom.

Instead, it looked like a butterfly.

A gigantic multicolored butterfly.

One wing glowed deep red.

The other wing shimmered bright blue.

And there was no middle path at all.

The red wing contained castles mysteriously assessed far BELOW the proclaimed benchmark.

Some so far below that the tax break itself was bigger than the recent arms-length sale price.

The blue wing contained cottages assessed far ABOVE what neighboring villagers paid.

And somehow — even after the overassessed blue cottages were added together — the giant underassessed red castles still outweighed them.

By approximately 1.7 million dollars.

In just the 53-parcel sample in the poverty-stricken Town of Hamden alone.

The butterfly fluttered silently above the kingdom whispering:

“Somebody is paying less.”
“Somebody else is paying more.”
“Somebody is about to become very nervous.”

The journalist adjusted her enchanted calculator.

“Interesting,” she said.

So she gathered fifty-three magical parcels to double-check - because that's what all boring statisticians do - and compared:

recent sale prices;
actual assessments;
and the Royal Promise of “uniform 20% increases for everyone.”

The numbers exploded like fireworks inside a tax office.

One castle sold for $763,000 had somehow become magically assessed at only $144,900.

Another sold for $575,000 yet floated through the royal tax rolls at merely $222,100.

The butterfly twitched.

Then the butterflies of Butterfly Valley became extremely agitated.

Because the obnoxious creature with the calculator began noticing something else.

Some of the fattest, reddest butterfly wings belonged not merely to random peasants, but to Very Important People of the Kingdom.

Some belonged to:
royal ambassadors;
committee knights;
keepers of public funds;
friends of the castle;
and gentlemen who loudly shouted:

“Fairness for all!”

while privately fluttering through the valley on highly unusual assessments.

One ambassador in particular was famous throughout Delco for shaking his fist at journalists.

Not metaphorically.

Literally.

He had once cornered another reporter and waved a balled fist like an enraged medieval goose defending a pile of enchanted receipts.

Naturally, this made him exceptionally qualified for:
public accountability speeches;
oversight boards;
special committees;
and perhaps a particularly luxurious butterfly wing.

The journalist looked at the spreadsheet.

Then at the ambassador.

Then back at the spreadsheet.

“Oh dear,” she whispered.

Because the butterfly was no longer merely statistical.

It had become political.

And political butterflies are the natural enemy of castles.

Especially castles with delayed audits.

Soon the Royal Court stopped discussing:
the numbers;
the sale prices;
the missing school money;
the disappearing tax base;
or the magical vanishing assessments.

Instead every hearing became:

“Why is this journalist so persistent?”
“Why does she keep looking at records?”
“Why does she keep comparing numbers?”
“Can somebody file sanctions against this butterfly woman?”

Meanwhile the ambassador continued shaking his fist.

The Royal Wizard of Delco nodded approvingly from Hancock Castle.

And the Royal Audit Turtle quietly delayed itself another two months.

While all this was happening, something very peculiar continued inside Butterfly Valley.

Some tax breaks became so enormous that the butterfly’s red wing began flashing.

The journalist blinked.

Then blinked again.

At first she assumed the Royal Assessors had merely misplaced a decimal point beneath a stack of committee minutes and emergency public-relations statements.

But the more she compared:
recent sale prices;
actual assessments;
and the Royal Promise of “uniform 20% increases,”

the stranger the butterfly became.

Because once the “uniform 20% increase” was added back into the spread, the upper butterfly wing was no longer merely 81% below the supposed benchmark.

For one red castle, it reached 101% - more than the actual sale price itself.

The butterfly had become radioactive.

Now, had the Royal Council simply said:
“Yes, assessments vary,”

nobody would have cared much.

But the Royal Council had spent months screaming:

“UNIFORM!”
“FAIR!”
“EVERYBODY 20%!”
“PLEASE STOP LOOKING AT THE BUTTERFLY!”

Unfortunately for governments, butterflies are difficult to cross-examine.

The journalist then made a horrifying discovery.

The fifty-three parcels were merely a spoonful from a kingdom containing 44,117 parcels spread across nineteen municipalities.

Nineteen.

Forty-four thousand one hundred seventeen.

The enchanted calculator began smoking violently.

Then the journalist committed the greatest crime of all.

She extrapolated.

Now, extrapolation is ancient and forbidden statistical magic.

Kings hate it.

Committees fear it.

Public-relations departments treat it the same way medieval villagers treated plague rats.

Because extrapolation asks one horrifying question:

“If this is happening HERE… how much is happening EVERYWHERE?”

The journalist immediately added important disclaimers to her scrolls, because unlike the Royal Council, statisticians occasionally enjoy methodological caution.

She carefully explained:

equalization rates differed across municipalities;
assessment practices differed;
not all towns had the same proclaimed 20% increase;
and therefore, under normal conditions of statistical inquiry it would not be proper to simply multiply the fifty-three-parcel sample mechanically across all nineteen municipalities and declare an exact county-wide number.

But she also explained something else.

The Kingdom of Delco itself had made accurate verification impossible.

Because the moment the butterfly began glowing and then flashing — and the moment Delco saw that interesting butterfly activity when routinely surveilling the creature’s IP address activity on Delco's online systems (as Delco’s court ambassador inadvertently blurted under oath in court papers) — Delco suddenly:
raised paywalls;
raised double paywalls;
restricted deed access;
obstructed record review;
and generally behaved like a dragon sitting on top of a pile of tax rolls screaming:

“NO YOU MAY NOT CHECK THE REST.”

Which meant the kingdom was simultaneously claiming:

“You do not have enough data to prove county-wide underassessment!”

while also screaming:

“AND YOU MAY NOT ACCESS THE DATA NECESSARY TO VERIFY IT!”

This impressed the Royal Committees enormously.

Still, the extrapolation itself terrified the kingdom.

Because according to the Royal Census Scrolls, the entire Kingdom of Delco contained only about 44,191 people.

Forty-four thousand one hundred ninety-one.

A tiny kingdom.

A poor kingdom.

A kingdom perpetually wandering from one public meeting to another sighing dramatically about:
budget shortages;
staffing shortages;
road repair crises;
school pressures;
equipment problems;
tax burdens;
financial emergencies;
and the eternal tragedy that there was simply never enough money for anything.

Every committee meeting in Delco sounded like a medieval famine announcement.

“We regret to inform the peasants that the treasury is empty.”
“Again.”
“Please prepare for another difficult budget season.”

The Royal Audit Turtle itself had recently announced that the kingdom’s audit was delayed because of staffing shortages and unfinished financial records.

The villagers were therefore constantly instructed to:
pay more taxes;
accept fewer services;
expect delays;
lower expectations;
and appreciate the difficult financial reality facing the kingdom.

Which made the butterfly deeply inconvenient.

Because if the same general rate of giant butterfly-wing tax breaks appearing inside the fifty-three-parcel sample were even remotely consistent across the broader kingdom—

even approximately—

then the hidden burden shifted away from favored castles and onto ordinary taxpayers and local schools would not merely be “large.”

The underassessment - with all disclaimed variables that Delco would not let the creature see - would then approach

ONE BILLION FOUR HUNDRED FIFTEEN MILLION DOLLARS.

$1,415,073,584.91 - not in taxes, of course, but in tax underassessments that can generate taxes at different equalization rates.

At this point the enchanted calculator suffered what experts later described as an acute fiscal nervous breakdown.

Smoke began pouring from its buttons.

Its tiny enchanted receipt printer started screaming continuously.

Several numbers attempted to flee the spreadsheet entirely.

The calculator desperately tried:
rounding the number down;
dividing it by committees;
placing it inside an executive session;
hiding it behind equalization rates;
and finally pretending it was merely a “communication issue.”

Nothing worked.

The number remained there.

Glowing.

Judgmental.

One billion four hundred fifteen million dollars of potentially underassessed value, hidden behind Delco's paywalled deed records data.

The calculator immediately attempted to resign from public service, seek witness protection, and relocate to a peaceful accounting office in Vermont.

Unfortunately the Royal Council confiscated its batteries.

Three emergency committees were formed immediately.

The Committee on Dangerous Arithmetic.

The Committee on Public Confidence in Smaller Numbers.

And the Special Advisory Task Force on Why the Butterfly Is Probably Racist Against Castles.

Meanwhile the radioactive butterfly hovered peacefully above Delco whispering:

“The funds are literally right there, Your Majesty.”

Right there inside the glowing red wing.

Right there inside the castles floating mysteriously beneath proclaimed “uniform” assessments.

Right there inside giant invisible tax breaks quietly shifting the tax burden away from favored properties and onto ordinary villagers carrying exploding tax bills through the snow.

The horrifying part was not merely the butterfly itself.

The horrifying part was that the kingdom appeared far more interested in guillotining the woman pointing at the butterfly—

than in addressing the butterfly itself.

Because when the giant extrapolated number was spread across the population of Delco, the burden came out to roughly:

THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER PERSON.

Per person.

The journalist immediately added yet another disclaimer, because statisticians enjoy ruining dramatic moments with additional accuracy.

She explained:

“Not every villager owns property.”
“Not every villager pays property taxes directly.”
“Children do not pay school taxes.”
“Many residents are poor.”
“Some villagers rent.”
“Therefore the actual burden on actual taxpayers would likely be MUCH HIGHER.”

The calculator burst briefly into flames.

Because suddenly the butterfly was no longer merely fluttering around spreadsheets.

Now it hovered directly above:
school budgets;
roads;
retirees;
working families;
small businesses;
and one of the poorest rural kingdoms in New York.

A kingdom forever insisting:

“There is no money.”
“We are struggling.”
“The budget is strained.”
“The audit is delayed.”
“The staffing crisis is severe.”
“Please prepare for cuts.”

And all the while the butterfly kept hovering silently above the kingdom whispering:

“The funds are right there.”

The journalist attempted to explain:

“I am literally asking for access to records so I can determine whether the extrapolation is accurate.”

The Royal Wizard of Delco nearly swallowed his own beard in panic.

“Exactly!” he cried.
“That is the dangerous part!”

The Royal Council immediately convened:
an Emergency Transparency Committee;
a Special Committee on Public Confidence;
a Task Force on Misinformation;
and a Working Group on Dangerous Butterflies.

Because in Delco every crisis was solved by:
forming a committee;
issuing a press release;
or delaying an audit.

Especially delaying an audit.

The Royal Audit Turtle was therefore summoned again.

The turtle arrived carrying a sign reading:

“AUDIT COMING… EVENTUALLY.”

The Council applauded wildly.

Meanwhile the journalist attempted to continue reviewing deeds and records.

But suddenly:
paywalls appeared;
double paywalls appeared;
records became harder to access;
and magical online gates demanded coins before revealing documents that had once stood freely in sunlight.

The journalist complained.

The Council gasped in horror.

Not at the numbers.

At the complaining.

Soon the Royal Wizard of Delco emerged from Hancock Castle wearing purple robes and carrying the legendary Wand of Sanctions.

“BEHOLD!” cried the wizard.
“You are not a journalist!”
“You are a vexatious butterfly extremist!”

The wizard then cast his favorite spells:

Motionus Sanctionibus.
Prolixity Maximus.
Anti-Filing Injunctionus.
Procedural Smoke Screenicus.

Whenever the journalist pointed at numbers, the wizard waved his wand and shouted:

“LOOK OVER THERE!”

Sometimes he summoned emergency motions.

Sometimes he summoned procedural fog.

Sometimes he summoned magical affidavits declaring:

“We lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief…”

even about things everybody in the kingdom already knew.

Still the journalist continued gathering records.

So the Council escalated further.

Soon every hearing looked less like a court proceeding and more like a medieval anti-butterfly tribunal.

The journalist would arrive carrying graphs.

The Council would arrive carrying sanctions motions.

The judges stared nervously at the butterfly.

The butterfly stared back.

Meanwhile taxpayers throughout the kingdom opened their tax bills and screamed:

“WHY DOES MY COTTAGE PAY MORE THAN THE CASTLE?”

The schools asked:

“Where did our money go?”

The Council answered:

“Please respect the process.”

And every time the journalist tried to continue the investigation, another committee appeared explaining that:
the audit was delayed;
the staffing was difficult;
the records were unavailable;
the timing was unfortunate;
the butterfly was misleading;
the calculator was aggressive;
and perhaps the real problem was not the numbers at all—

but the woman pointing at them.

Still the butterfly refused to disappear.

Because butterflies are stubborn creatures.

Especially statistical ones.

And so the tale of the Radioactive Butterfly of Delco spread across the hills.

People laughed.

People argued.

People stared at the graphs.

But one dangerous thing happened above all:

People started looking at the numbers themselves.

And that, dear reader, was the one thing the Kingdom of Delco never wanted to happen.

Monday, May 18, 2026

Tennessee v Lane revisited - I WILL NOT CRAWL UP THOSE STAIRS

 





On May 18, 2026, I filed 48 documents across six Delaware County Supreme Court cases, across 6 court cases, in sets of three 

(Affirmation shown here - Calendar for May 20, 2026 of Justice McBride - Calendar for May 20, 2026 of Justice Baker) - simply to notify the court that I - SIMPLY - CANNOT - DO IT.  

And for your reference - if you think that there are too many "Neroni v. XYZ" lawsuits in here - the XYZ people themselves deliberately engaged in a variety of procedural shenanigans, such as removal one of 3 cases meant for consolidation to federal court, then unreasonably keeping them there after jurisdiction of the court ended - 


while doing some nasty things that required to file a separate lawsuit, and then coming as a ton of bricks against us begging a judge (appointed by an administrative judge who a brother of the main law firm's managing partner, convenient, right?) claiming that they are innocent victims attacked by the vicious Neronis.  That is predatory behavior, completely dishonest.  

Took a lot out of me - as I said in the affirmation, I slept 5 hours a day for the last month trying - quite unnecessarily, I must say, there is no national emergency requiring the court to drive invalids into the ground to prepare for court - to comply with impossible demands of two judges-with-grudges: Baker and McBride.

They really, really overdid it with their motion pileup.

It does not even remotely look like justice or fairness.

Out of my prior experience as a trial lawyer, I can tell you - a mere request, no ADA disability accommodation or anything - by any lawyer if they have just two overlapping motions is usually instantly granted for the asking.

I have 18 motions pending at the same time.

I started to ask the court to stop this nonsense when there were 8 or 9 on the calendar - since then the court instead doubled it.

So - I openly refused to meet any impossible calendar, for the simple reason: it is physically impossible.

There is no point pointing fingers at my skill as a lawyer (funny, isn't it - I am not a skilled lawyer to represent clients and earn a living, but I am so that a bunch of dishonorable nepos would seek sanctions against an invalid) where I am very simply not given enough time to prepare.

I did not try to polish the affirmation.

This is not my usual work - and those who know how diligent I am to everything I file, from contents to form to fonts to everything - would know that at a glance from this affirmation.

There is simply an end coming sometimes to useless, futile efforts that not so slowly, physically, are killing you - for no reason.

I just wanted, as a journalist, as a taxpayer, as a property owner - access to court to vindicate my claims against the local government.

That is not a crime.

That is what Congress provided for by enacting The Civil Rights Act, 42 USC 1983.

I attached to my Affirmation the actual May 20, 2026 calendars of Justices Baker and McBride because at some point abstractions stop working.  

People need to see what “manageable litigation” supposedly looks like for a disabled pro se litigant in Delaware County.

The calendars show approximately eighteen motions clustered onto a single date across overlapping cases. 

Some seek dismissal. 

Some seek sanctions. 

Some seek restrictions on access to court itself - which is interesting, given that I am an active filer of FOIL/1st Amendment requests as a journalist, so Delaware County is dishonorably seeking to cut me off from sources of newsgathering and is trying to get a license to deny me FOIL/1st requests, handicapping my reporting - with complete impunity. 

All motions put on the calendar by Justice Baker require oral argument.   Do not believe the actual calendar saying no appearances.  All of them require appearances - I have notifications from the court for it.

That I am at the same time suing "Justice" Baker and that he has claimed impartiality and sticks to my cases, denying me ADA accommodation, says a lot about his character.  To me - he is not only less than a lawyer and less than a judge.  He is less than a man.  The same as what I can say about "Justice" McBride.  I do not think, given the circumstances, anybody can blame me.

McBride and Baker (one a defendant in front of the other, but who cares, right?) pressed these 18 motions simultaneously against the same disabled litigant while the same court system refuses to provide a confidential ADA accommodation process required by federal law and 22 NYCRR Part 52.

Then comes the truly remarkable part.

The Court insists that my disability disclosures are too “conclusory,” while simultaneously refusing to provide any confidential mechanism through which more detailed medical information could safely be submitted. So the system creates a Catch-22:

Disclose disability information publicly on NYSCEF, or receive no accommodation.

But once disability information is disclosed publicly, opposing counsel suddenly begin behaving as though ADA accommodations are something they are entitled to “oppose” like ordinary adversarial motion practice. Several fully staffed law firms openly filed letters urging denial of accommodations. 

Here's one of them - by a litigation counsel of Delaware County's litigation counsel Frank Miller who I happen to be suing, among other things, for fraud upon the court.



Apparently, disabled litigants in Delaware County now have the privilege to be submitted to judicial whim and veto power of politically connected law firms instead of getting disability benefits mandated by federal law.

So I stopped trying to make the situation look polished, or about orderly administration of justice and not middle-school-style backyard gang-bullying, which is what it truly is.

I stopped trying to selectively sanitize the record to make it aesthetically pleasing for people who are deliberately torturing two invalids - simply because they think they have the power to do that.  

Instead, I filed the record as it actually exists:

  • the congestion,
  • the refusals,
  • the objections,
  • the exhaustion,
  • the pressure,
  • the retaliatory timing,
  • the public exposure of ADA requests,
  • the paywalled records,
  • and the physical collapse that follows.

I am not crawling up those stairs.

Tennessee v. Lane exists for a reason.























Welcome to Tri-County Justice Land: Where Moot Motions Rise From the Dead and Old Grudges Never Retire - come watch the circu... oh, sorry... the slaught.... or sorry - the little "oral argument" on May 20, 2026 by Microsoft Teams

 





Once upon a time, in the glorious Tri-County Judicial Kingdom, there stood a giant pink castle known as the Tower of Judicial Infallibility.

Above its gates hung a golden sign:

“Past grudges never retire. They get promoted.”

And in that kingdom lived two mighty masters of procedural sorcery.

The first was Supreme Wizard McBride, Keeper of the ancient scroll known as
“Vendetta Playbook No. 1.”

The second was King Baker the Magnificent, Lord of Deadline Extensions and Reviver of Dead Motions.

Wizard McBride possessed a rare magical power:
anything that had already died procedurally could be resurrected with one swing of his enchanted gavel.

“Moot?” he would say.
“Nullified? Excellent! Bring it back anyway!”

King Baker possessed an even stranger gift:
he could simultaneously be:

  • a judge,

  • a defaulting defendant

  • and still preside over his opponent's cases - including his own.

Whenever peasants nervously whispered:

“But Your Majesty… they are suing you…”

King Baker smiled calmly from his throne of stacked motion papers.

“Exactly,” he replied.
“That is why I understand the matter better than anyone.”

And so life in Tri-County Justice Land continued peacefully.

Until one terrible day.

Two terrifying creatures arrived at the castle gates:

Disabled pro se litigants.

They did not ask for treasure.
They did not ask for power.
They did not ask for dragons.

They asked for something far more dangerous.

ADA accommodations.

The court clerks screamed.

The lawyers fainted dramatically onto leather briefcases.

The Emergency Siren of Procedural Doom began to howl throughout the kingdom.

“WARNING!” cried the royal herald.
“They are requesting… reasonable modifications!”

Panic spread through the Judicial Ivory Tower.

Wizard McBride immediately summoned the Council of Ancient Grievances.

“Who are these people?” asked a young clerk.

McBride narrowed his eyes darkly.

“Long ago,” he said slowly, “one of them defeated me in criminal court.”

The room gasped.

“And then,” McBride continued bitterly, “the appellate court wrote extremely unpleasant things about me.”

The torches flickered.

“What things?” whispered the terrified clerk.

McBride unrolled the ancient Third Department scroll and read aloud in horror:

“…maligned defense counsel and his arguments…”

The entire courtroom crossed itself with gavels.

Meanwhile, King Baker sat proudly upon his golden throne made entirely of extension motions.

Around him towered enormous piles labeled:

  • “VOID AB INITIO,”

  • “REVIVED SANCTIONS,”

  • “MOTION STILL ALIVE SOMEHOW,”

  • and the darkest procedural magic of all:
    “CONFERENCE SCHEDULED ANYWAY.”

Below the throne stood the legendary Ducking Stool of Judicial Efficiency.

And beneath it sat the two disabled litigants in wheelchairs.

Cold water of Procedural Fairness poured over their heads.

The man’s feet bled onto the courthouse floor.

“Perhaps,” said one nervous young page, “we should grant an accommodation?”

The courtroom exploded with laughter.

King Baker slammed his royal scepter.

“In THIS kingdom,” he declared,
“ADA stands for:

Add More Deadlines Automatically.”

Thunderous applause erupted from the VIP Lawyer Section.

Rubber ducks rained from the ceiling.

A court jester danced through the hall shouting:

“REVIVE THE VOID!
IGNORE THE LAW!
PUNISH THE DISABLED FOR DARING TO COMPLAIN!”

And all around the kingdom, the official motto glittered proudly in gold:

“Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied.
But Procedural Revenge Is Forever.”


PS  After King Baker was notified of this fairy tale, he immediately added another motion to dismiss with a personal appearance to the pile

PPS  By the way, you may see the entertaining slaughter of two disabled litigants, one of them this journalist, in real time, on May 20, 2026 on this calendar of King Baker if you apply for virtual appearance (only e-mail address is needed).

You may apply to watch the circus here.  

Just fill out the application giving an e-mail to receive the link, and not your name or address.  The names and index numbers of cases can be obtained from the "King Baker calendar" link above.



I will greatly appreciate if you tell me that you applied, I need at least an approximate count of members of the public who watched the court hearing - because the court adamantly refused to put such applications, and how they are being handled by the court, into the official docket. 

My concern is not trivial.  Before, another judge did this:



That judge had the audacity to ask my son, who the judge knew served in the 82nd Airborne, why the heck he wanted to see how his elderly and disabled parents would be discriminated and abused by that judge in an online hearing.

The unlawful questioning of my son by Justice Patrick J. O'Sullivan occurred EX PARTE (the little "order" I published up above was not put into the official NYSCEF file).

Know that such little orders are patently unlawful.  Please, report to me if anything like that happens.

And, by the way, this is Judge McBride's calendar for the same day, May 20, 2026 - only Judge McBride, more efficiently, did not hold any hearings, even where he had to, see my recent blogs about Judge McBride here, here and here.

He simply co-ordinated the calendar with King Baker, A DEFENDANT in one of the cases that Judge McBride jammed on us on the same calendar date - making it that much difficult to respond to King Baker's POST-DEFAULT motion to dismiss without leave of court.  See my blogs about King Baker here, here and here.

But - in the TriCounty Judicial La-La Land time froze as a mosquito in resin - nothing changes, nobody changes, no law applies.  Business as usual.



Saturday, May 16, 2026

The exciting story of the WAC Castle

 


The Watershed Kingdom

Once upon a time, in the misty green hills of the Catskills, there arose a magnificent kingdom dedicated to protecting water.

Not farmers.

Not towns.

Not people.

Water.

The Kingdom was called the Watershed Agricultural Council, although everyone in the countryside simply called it “The Castle.”

Nobody was entirely sure who owned The Castle.

The Castle itself insisted it was private.

The City insisted it was independent.

The farmers insisted somebody was definitely in charge.

And the paperwork insisted everybody needed another form.

At the center of the Kingdom stood the Sacred Lever of Filtration Avoidance.

The Lever was guarded day and night by administrators in fleece vests carrying binders thick enough to stop rifle rounds. Legend said that if the Lever was ever disturbed, New York City would be forced to build a gigantic filtration plant made of gold, concrete, and taxpayer tears.

So the Lever could never be touched.

To protect the Lever, the Kingdom developed many sacred rituals.

There were Whole Farm Plans.

There were BMPs.

There were Easement Guidelines.

There were Resource Protection Areas.

There were Allocation Tracking Worksheets.

There were Annual Status Reviews.

And, of course, there was the most holy phrase of all:

“Consistent with the Conservation Purposes.”

Nobody knew exactly what the Conservation Purposes were.

But everybody agreed they were extremely important.

Farmer Bill discovered this one spring after asking whether he could move a culvert twelve feet downhill.

The Easement Committee assembled immediately.

Five solemn officials reviewed satellite maps, topographic contour lines, stream buffer diagrams, slope calculations, nutrient management charts, and historical cow trajectories.

Three months later, Farmer Bill received a forty-page determination.

The answer was:

“Maybe.”

Meanwhile, giant trucks from the City arrived every year carrying mountains of money.

The Kingdom called these “Program Funds.”

The farmers called them “the reason the lights stay on.”

The Castle insisted the money did not create control.

This was explained carefully in many legal documents.

The explanation usually went something like this:

“Although ninety-five percent of our funding comes from the City, and although the City reviews budgets, audits expenditures, approves projects, monitors compliance, oversees implementation, reviews contracts, participates on committees, controls payment approval, and determines whether the work is satisfactory, we remain a completely private organization.”

The farming community listened respectfully.

Mostly because nobody wanted another site inspection.

At meetings, the Kingdom spoke constantly of partnership.

The farmers were told they were stakeholders.

They were collaborators.

They were stewards.

They were participants.

They were sustainable.

They were resilient.

But somehow they were never simply owners of their own damned farms anymore.

A man could inherit three hundred acres from his grandfather, survive floods, survive droughts, survive milk prices, survive Albany, survive Washington, survive taxes, survive equipment loans — and still end up needing committee review to decide whether a shed created too much impervious surface.

The Kingdom was very concerned about impervious surface.

Except parking lots for administrators.

Those were apparently sacred.

And although the Castle declared itself independent, the entire countryside understood an obvious truth:

The moment the City stopped funding the Kingdom, the Sacred Lever would begin to shake.

The reports would stop.

The consultants would vanish.

The binders would dry up.

The committees would dissolve into the forest.

And somewhere deep inside the Castle, somebody would whisper the forbidden words:

“We may need filtration, after all.”

Which was, of course, the one thing the Kingdom feared more than transparency.

The strange thing was that the farmers were not even against conservation.

Most of them had spent generations protecting streams long before anyone invented PowerPoint presentations about watershed resilience.

They knew every bend of every creek.

They knew which fields flooded.

Which springs dried up.

Which hills washed out after October rain.

Which woods held snow longest.

But none of that counted unless it appeared in a formally approved planning document reviewed under proper procedures pursuant to applicable guidelines.

The Kingdom trusted paper.

Paper was measurable.

Paper could be audited.

Paper could be monitored.

Paper could justify budgets.

A farmer’s memory was merely experience.

And experience, unfortunately, was not grant-compatible.

So life continued in the Watershed Kingdom.

The cows grazed.

The committees convened.

The reports accumulated.

The Lever remained untouched.

And every year, the Castle repeated the same sacred proclamation to the countryside:

“We are not a governmental entity.”

While standing knee-deep in government money.

Under government supervision.

Performing government functions.

To satisfy government mandates.

For the benefit of government infrastructure.

In partnership with government agencies.

Under government agreements.

With government oversight.

But absolutely, completely, unquestionably private.

Naturally.