THE EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL TYRANNY IN THE UNITED STATES:

"If the judges interpret the laws themselves, and suffer none else to interpret, they may easily make, of the laws, [a shredded] shipman's hose!" - King James I of England, around 1616.

“No class of the community ought to be allowed freer scope in the expression or publication of opinions as to the capacity, impartiality or integrity of judges than members of the bar. They have the best opportunities of observing and forming a correct judgment. They are in constant attendance on the courts. Hundreds of those who are called on to vote never enter a court-house, or if they do, it is only at intervals as jurors, witnesses or parties. To say that an attorney can only act or speak on this subject under liability to be called to account and to be deprived of his profession and livelihood by the very judge or judges whom he may consider it his duty to attack and expose, is a position too monstrous to be entertained for a moment under our present system,” Justice Sharwood in Ex Parte Steinman and Hensel, 95 Pa 220, 238-39 (1880).

“This case illustrates to me the serious consequences to the Bar itself of not affording the full protections of the First Amendment to its applicants for admission. For this record shows that [the rejected attorney candidate] has many of the qualities that are needed in the American Bar. It shows not only that [the rejected attorney candidate] has followed a high moral, ethical and patriotic course in all of the activities of his life, but also that he combines these more common virtues with the uncommon virtue of courage to stand by his principles at any cost.

It is such men as these who have most greatly honored the profession of the law. The legal profession will lose much of its nobility and its glory if it is not constantly replenished with lawyers like these. To force the Bar to become a group of thoroughly orthodox, time-serving, government-fearing individuals is to humiliate and degrade it.” In Re Anastaplo, 18 Ill. 2d 182, 163 N.E.2d 429 (1959), cert. granted, 362 U.S. 968 (1960), affirmed over strong dissent, 366 U.S. 82 (1961), Justice Black, Chief Justice Douglas and Justice Brennan, dissenting.

" I do not believe that the practice of law is a "privilege" which empowers Government to deny lawyers their constitutional rights. The mere fact that a lawyer has important responsibilities in society does not require or even permit the State to deprive him of those protections of freedom set out in the Bill of Rights for the precise purpose of insuring the independence of the individual against the Government and those acting for the Government”. Lathrop v Donohue, 367 US 820 (1961), Justice Black, dissenting.

"The legal profession must take great care not to emulate the many occupational groups that have managed to convert licensure from a sharp weapon of public defense into blunt instrument of self-enrichment". Walter Gellhorn, "The Abuse of Occupational Licensing", University of Chicago Law Review, Volume 44 Issue 1, September of 1976.

“Because the law requires that judges no matter how corrupt, who do not act in the clear absence of jurisdiction while performing a judicial act, are immune from suit, former Judge Ciavarella will escape liability for the vast majority of his conduct in this action. This is, to be sure, against the popular will, but it is the very oath which he is alleged to have so indecently, cavalierly, baselessly and willfully violated for personal gain that requires this Court to find him immune from suit”, District Judge A. Richard Caputo in H.T., et al, v. Ciavarella, Jr, et al, Case No. 3:09-cv-00286-ARC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Document 336, page 18, November 20, 2009. This is about judges who were sentencing kids to juvenile detention for kickbacks.


Tuesday, May 10, 2016

#BarbaraO'Sullivan'sHouseFire: how many more coincidences can there be for the feds to get involved?

Ok, so Ryan Adams, the alleged U.S. Marine and the father of Barbara's older grandchild (she has two now), committed several violent crimes against Barbara O'Sullivan and Alecia Bracci (assaults, strangling, death threats), and was never investigated or prosecuted.

Ryan Adams caused the other local nut Derek Bowie to arrest Alecia and Barbara - on a false warrant of Judge Richard Gumo, and there is a court order of Judge John Lambert adjudicating the warrant as false, because of Judge Gumo's perjury on the stand.

Derek Bowie is sued in two courts by two lookalike women who she assaulted and tried to kill.

Delaware County does not investigate either Ryan Adams or Derek Bowie for the attempted murder of two women and a soon-to-be born baby on the night of April 22/23, 2016.

No records of the house fire are being released to the victims by the law enforcement.

The victims were shooed out of a public meeting of the Delhi Fire Department.

Wife of a Delhi Fire Department firefighter, "coincidentally" an employee of the Delaware County Department of Social Services, posts hate comments on my blog about the house fire.

A close relative of Delaware County Deputy Commissioner of Social Services Bill Aikens, who sold the now-burnt house to Barbara 30 years ago, is consulted about the house on the day of the fire (and some source disclosed that a relative of an Aikens family may be also behind the fire).

Now, when Alecia gave birth to a child (that same child who was supposed to be murdered and was targeted with a flaming explosive projectile that landed on Alecia's bed in the middle of the night), the nurse in charge of seizing the baby is - guess who - 

Brigid Maguire, a teacher in Delhi Tech, and, quite "coincidentally", the Forewoman of the Grand Jury who signed the now-dismissed indictment against Barbara.

Here is the nurse:



The hospital sent the baby's stool out to check it for drugs, even though there was no reason to do that, the mother's urine was clear, the baby was healthy on birth, they are still checking the baby for drugs.  Which is not any problem.

Pediatric nurse grilled the mother about the alleged "loss of custody" - where there were no issues of abuse or neglect involved, the "indicated report" against the mother was vacated in 2012.

Then, the hospital personnel grilled the mother about identity of the father - which was NONE of the hospital's business, and an unconstitutional invasion of privacy of the mother.

All of that on Delaware County's call to Otsego County CPS that came "late yesterday afternoon"?

And that happened "coincidentally" after Alecia talked to her older daughter over the phone and told her she has a sibling?

How crooked can the Delaware County get?

They first try to put the baby under stress and cause Alecia, possibly, to have a premature labor or miscarriage by subjecting her to a jury trial on a fabricated charge.

Then, they refuse to investigate an arson and murder, likely committed by one of their own, against that same baby.

When that did not "help", they are trying to seize the baby with the hands of the Grand Jury Forewoman, and are shamelessly claiming that the reason for grabbing the baby is:

1) that Alecia "lost custody" of her first child through the corrupt decision of Carl Becker, and based on the indicated report that has been VACATED in 2012;

2) and that Alecia does not have "accommodations" when her house burnt around her - so, now we seize children of victims of house fires because of house fires, that's what we are doing?

Nobody from the County tried to provide Alecia and Barbara with any "accommodations".  

Instead, the County failed to extinguish the fire, and failed to investigate the fire, instead spreading rumors through Sharon Rieckert-Morgan that the house belonged to somebody else and that Barbara did not pay the mortgage.

Changing the deed on Barbara's house to some fly-by-night "mortgage servicing" company, despite an order of 2009 that the house belongs to Barbara, and changing it, without Barbara's knowledge or consent, into a "two-family" unit while it is a one-family unit, simply to increase taxes on the property, is also a "coincidence" and what Delaware County, obviously with participation of its Treasurer Beverly Shields (Carl Becker's personal friend) did. 

Now that the County had to change the property back into Barbara's name, they want to take something else - her precious second grandchild.

Barbara's sister Mary and Alecia's aunt, is currently providing housing for them - which is obviously not enough for Social Services, who want now to seize the baby UNLESS Alecia talks to them.

Of course, seizing the baby may not be used as a tool of coercion for the parent to talk.

And of course, being the victim of a house fire and living with relatives is not a basis to remove the child or put a "security lock" on the child's little foot.

Of course, there is some information that Barbara's other two siblings are trying to influence Mary to throw Barbara, Alecia and the baby out - threatening that otherwise they will not come down for Mary's daughter's graduation this year, and I wonder whether such threats area also "inspired" by the glorious Delaware County Department of Social Services trying to first deprive the mother of a roof over her head, and then to take the child because there is no roof over her head.

I am sure Delaware County knows how illegal what they are doing is, and that they are running the county and its taxpayers head-first into yet another lawsuit.

When Delaware County is trying to take a child and grandchild of people who 

  • did sue the Delaware County in federal court, 
  • are suing the Delaware County in state court at this time, 
  • where the Delaware County's illegal "indicated reports" against these women, arranged by Becker and Moon, were vacated, 
  • where both women sued Becker and Moon,
  • where both of these women were exonerated when fabricated criminal proceedings were brought against them, 
  • when after the criminal proceedings were terminated in their favor, 
    • their dogs die, 
    • their house is burnt down, 
    • nobody wants to extinguish the fire, 
    • investigate the fire, arson and attempted murder, or
    • give them records about the fire investigation or police reports  - and under THOSE circumstances Delaware County is now attempting to take their newborn child and grandchild away, don't you think there is a little bit too many coincidences?


I am sure nurse Brigid Maguire knows how illegal is to seize the baby without a court order, or put a lock on the baby's foot without a court order,





 and there is no court order and cannot be a court order at this time, there are no grounds for it.

I am sure that Basset Hospital does not need another lawsuit - which is waiting to happen.

There is actually a "security lock" put on the baby's foot like she is a prisoner - at the request of Delaware County Department of Social Services, employer of the firefighter's wife Sharon Rieckert-Morgan.

Right now the hospital is trying to invent reasons why to keep the baby.

They are trying to monitor diaper changing - which is a perfectly routine task that two women who handled babies before can certainly handle without supervision.

They are trying to have groups of nursing students invade the mother's room without asking consent of the mother.

The hospital even sent an unsupervised student to try to take the child away from the arms of grandmother claiming that the grandmother should not be holding the child while sitting in a chair.

When Barbara questioned authority of an unsupervised nursing student to grab the child, she gave the child back and disappeared, and no supervisor came to talk about that.

They sent out the baby's stool for drugs - even though there was no reason to do that.

They are trying ANYTHING to find fault with these women - only because Delaware County Department of Social Services, which has every reason to retaliate against these women, requested now to seize the baby.

How much more these two women - and now a baby - have to endure?

Isn't it cruel to put a new mother - and a new baby - under such stress?

After she and the child survived a near-miss death in an obvious arson and a house fire less than a month ago?

Isn't it time for Delaware County officials to be held accountable for their rampant criminal activity where Delaware County is going all out to kill, maim, incarcerate or take children away from their critics?

How much more should happen before the feds wake up and get involved?

Disgusting.

No comments:

Post a Comment