THE EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL TYRANNY IN THE UNITED STATES:

"If the judges interpret the laws themselves, and suffer none else to interpret, they may easily make, of the laws, [a shredded] shipman's hose!" - King James I of England, around 1616.

“No class of the community ought to be allowed freer scope in the expression or publication of opinions as to the capacity, impartiality or integrity of judges than members of the bar. They have the best opportunities of observing and forming a correct judgment. They are in constant attendance on the courts. Hundreds of those who are called on to vote never enter a court-house, or if they do, it is only at intervals as jurors, witnesses or parties. To say that an attorney can only act or speak on this subject under liability to be called to account and to be deprived of his profession and livelihood by the very judge or judges whom he may consider it his duty to attack and expose, is a position too monstrous to be entertained for a moment under our present system,” Justice Sharwood in Ex Parte Steinman and Hensel, 95 Pa 220, 238-39 (1880).

“This case illustrates to me the serious consequences to the Bar itself of not affording the full protections of the First Amendment to its applicants for admission. For this record shows that [the rejected attorney candidate] has many of the qualities that are needed in the American Bar. It shows not only that [the rejected attorney candidate] has followed a high moral, ethical and patriotic course in all of the activities of his life, but also that he combines these more common virtues with the uncommon virtue of courage to stand by his principles at any cost.

It is such men as these who have most greatly honored the profession of the law. The legal profession will lose much of its nobility and its glory if it is not constantly replenished with lawyers like these. To force the Bar to become a group of thoroughly orthodox, time-serving, government-fearing individuals is to humiliate and degrade it.” In Re Anastaplo, 18 Ill. 2d 182, 163 N.E.2d 429 (1959), cert. granted, 362 U.S. 968 (1960), affirmed over strong dissent, 366 U.S. 82 (1961), Justice Black, Chief Justice Douglas and Justice Brennan, dissenting.

" I do not believe that the practice of law is a "privilege" which empowers Government to deny lawyers their constitutional rights. The mere fact that a lawyer has important responsibilities in society does not require or even permit the State to deprive him of those protections of freedom set out in the Bill of Rights for the precise purpose of insuring the independence of the individual against the Government and those acting for the Government”. Lathrop v Donohue, 367 US 820 (1961), Justice Black, dissenting.

"The legal profession must take great care not to emulate the many occupational groups that have managed to convert licensure from a sharp weapon of public defense into blunt instrument of self-enrichment". Walter Gellhorn, "The Abuse of Occupational Licensing", University of Chicago Law Review, Volume 44 Issue 1, September of 1976.

“Because the law requires that judges no matter how corrupt, who do not act in the clear absence of jurisdiction while performing a judicial act, are immune from suit, former Judge Ciavarella will escape liability for the vast majority of his conduct in this action. This is, to be sure, against the popular will, but it is the very oath which he is alleged to have so indecently, cavalierly, baselessly and willfully violated for personal gain that requires this Court to find him immune from suit”, District Judge A. Richard Caputo in H.T., et al, v. Ciavarella, Jr, et al, Case No. 3:09-cv-00286-ARC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Document 336, page 18, November 20, 2009. This is about judges who were sentencing kids to juvenile detention for kickbacks.

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

While no incident report is coming as to the fire/explosion at Barbara O'Sullivan's house, the smear campaign is brewing - business as usual in Delaware County



I received a firestorm of messages from an employee of the Department of Social Services and an alleged wife of a firefighter accusing me - and the victim in the recent house fire Barbara O'Sullivan in all sorts of bad behavior.

 Barbara O'Sullivan asked local authorities for a police incident report - nothing, fire report - nothing.  But apparently there are a lot of people, especially "wives and mothers of firefighters" - who "know".

 They've never been at the site of the fire, but they still "know".

 Usually, such a firestorm means that the journalist is onto something good, so thank you, Sharon Reichert-Morgan.



Comments on my blog are not locked, so anyone can publish whatever comments he or she want.

 I, on my behalf, will publish any messages of Sharon Reichert-Morgan, with comments, tomorrow.  

 Now I need to go sleep in my warm cozy bed - as you accused me of doing at night.

 For now, here are comments of Sharon Riechert-Morgan published on Facebook.

 One of the "liking" crowd is, by the way, the employee of the Delaware County who may have sent an "unofficial" press-release against Barbara O'Sullivan in 2014.  She was not concerned about falsity of her statements then.

 So, we have all good and honorable people making comments.

 And laughing that my blog are incomprehensible.

 Laughing is beneficial for one's health. 

 As to anything here being "incomprehensible"... What can I say...

 When somebody does not comprehend some written text, and especially if that somebody toils at Delaware County Department of Social Services, it is not necessarily that the text is to blame.  It is usually the reader.  They are usually hired because they are members of this or that clan, for blood ties, not for smarts.

 I experienced encounters, as an attorney, with Delaware County Department of Social Services often on a daily basis.   Once again, they are not known for their smarts.

 Here is the comment of Sharon Riechert-Morgan and comments to her comment.

 By the way, Sharon Riechert-Morgan is all fired up about this blog article.  

 And - after she sent me her first river of fire (she has sent to me two rivers), I asked her whether she was at the fire site together with her husband when she was speaking as to what her husband did or did not do there.  

 She answered in the negative.  

 She was not there.  

 Her spitfire of indignation is pure hearsay.

 But - she believes that her husband is not a liar.  Good for her. I am not her husband's wife and do not have to believe him.

 At least we now know the name of at least one firefighter who was at the site that night, it will save me a FOIL request.

 Josh Morgan.  Husband of Sharon Riechert-Morgan.  Thank you for your effort, Sharon Riechert-Morgan.  You helped me a lot.

 Here are the comments.














Riechert-Morgan's river of fire, with personal threats against me, that she's sent me on Messenger will wait until tomorrow - for publishing and for being sent to authorities.

 As to my "crazy conspiracy theories"...

 Well...

 My "crazy" imagination cannot catch up with what is going on in Delaware County.

 That Delhi Town judge Richard L. Gumo (or his court clerk Cathy Fletcher) has a rubber-stamp to stamp, instead of sign, arrest warrants.

 That he would then lie under oath about it in front of Judge Lambert.

 That Judge Lambert would then dismiss a criminal felony case because of lies of a judge.

 Who would fathom such a situation?

 An arresting police officer Derek Bowie, nephew of Delaware County District Attorney's investigator Jeff Bowie, both uncle and nephew hired without credentials and not out of civil service registry, the nephew is hired without even an application - by an "invitation".

 Moreover, Derek Bowie, who goes around assaulting dogs and look-alike women, while Delaware County prosecutes his victims (at least one of them, Barbara O'Sullivan) and pays out of taxpayers' pockets for Derek Bowie's legal defense, claims, under oath, he is a legitimate police officer - yet, he is not, because he lives in Broome County (despite the residency requirement for Deputy Sheriffs in Delaware County), but PARKS HIS POLICE CAR at his mother's house in Delaware County, while keeping by his bed where he sleeps with his girlfriend a more necessary piece of police equipment - handcuffs.

 I couldn't have made that up, it is Delaware County.   In full glory. Revealed through a deposition of Derek Bowie, under oath.

 By the way, as soon as I posted information about Derek Bowie's serial assaults of look-alike women, Sharon Riechert-Morgan's friend Bridgett Berry started to contact Barbara's daughter to claim that that particular blog will hurt Barbara's case spewing defamatory statements about Kylie Smith that I am not going to repeat here.

 So, the smear campaign goes on against both of Derek Bowie's victims.  And is fired up by friends of Delaware County employees and by Delaware County employees themselves.

 And - if nobody did anything wrong, why did Barbara O'Sullivan's brother Jim's auto-shop became a confessional for firefighters and police officers who run there to bare their souls and claim that they did not do anything wrong?

 Because they did?

 What more revelations will happen in this case?

 Future will show.

 And once again, ladies and gentlemen, my readers, benevolent and hostile, my imagination cannot catch up with the flight of bizarre events in Delaware County.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)