Doxxing a child to spite Dana Scuderi-Hunter is unlawful, Mr. Miller - and retaliation against a whistleblower (and whistleblower's family) of such doxxing is unlawful, too

On May 16, 2025 I published here an article about child rape victim blaming efforts on behalf of a school district by attorney Frank W. Miller, longtime litigation counsel for Delaware County, NY and longtime friend of Chairperson Tina Mole and County Attorney Amy Merklen.  You can read it here.

On May 25, 2025 I have turned attorney Miller into the Attorney Grievance Committee for a very, very bad thing, also involving a 5 year old child - for online doxxing a minor child online in obvious effort to spite Dana Scuderi-Hunter, DSS Commissioner Attorney Miller helped Amy Merklen oust - for Scuderi-Hunter's truthful testimony in Family Court that Miller claimed in writing as "insubordination" and "disloyalty" to Amy Merklen.  

The "insubordination" and "disloyalty" charges drafted by Miller against DSS Commissioner Dana Scuderi-Hunter have since been annulled by the 3rd Department - but Miller and Merklen are still in denial of it, continuing to claim in different forums, including to different courts, that they "prevailed", with an implication that they prevailed on all grounds, including the annulled one.

Since then, Hancock Estabrook, through Miller's former associate Facciponte, bred in harassment at the knee of the best, so to say,

pursued charges of disloyalty and insubordination (through private harassment that came out in a publication, through FOIL requests and in depositions that resulted in Hancock having to get rid of Facciponte - but not of Miller yet) against two elected County Supervisors, of the Town of Hamden (came through depositions in Decker Advertisement Inc. v. Delaware County, all depositions are published here) and of the Town of Delhi.

Imagine that Miller and Hancock Estabrook recently "graciously accepted" a request for representation of their own victim of harassment Marshfield to represent him in a case I brought against a County-entwined non-profit Watershed Agricultural Council for retaliative firing of my child for my protected activity, Neroni v Watershed Agricultural Council, EF2026-106 in Delaware County Supreme Court.

Unsurprisingly, Miller stepped into that representation only to seek fire and destruction against me - and against my husband who was not a party - for the filing of the grievance.

Miller, despite default of his client and without (initially) seeking leave of court, immediately sought sanctions against me and my non-party husband (for the 10th time in 10 months) and an anti-filing injunction.  

Mr. Miller falsely claimed to the court - I am suing him for that, among other things - contrary to the record (see who is listed as a contact person for WAC's property on Beacon)

that Marshfield was not involved with WAC - not at all, he is an innocent individual who would say anything if Hancock threatens him - as Hancock did Supervisor Boukai - with yanking of litigation insurance coverage.

Actually, in depositions of Marshfield it already came out that Marshfield was coached by Hancock and submitted false affidavits to derail a deposition.

I dropped both Marshfield and his harasser attorney from hell from the lawsuit, together with their motion, but evidence of retaliation remains on NYSCEF, Neron v Watershed, EF2026-106, Doc. 34.  In that Affirmation, Mr. Miller sought to protect his employee (Erika Masler's) father Judge Mark Masler - who was sued for barring my access as a court watcher to the hearing in my child's case, in violation of Judiciary Law 4 and the 1st Amendment.

Of course, no disclosure was made by Mr. Miller that Mark Masler IS his employee's father.

Mr. Miller also pointed out that the 4th Department (that refused to discipline him based on his political connections and familial connections of his law firm) deprived me of my profession as a civil rights, criminal defense, defense-against-CPS, and consumer protection attorney (without saying that much) for refusing to sleep with Judge Carl Becker and to divorce my husband as Becker required through his accomplices, in order to expose my husband's property held as tenants by the entirety in marriage to the ransacking by the local sons-of-judges, even at the threat of harm to my child.

I wrote about the sons-of-judges and their little intimate practices with the court system here, and elsewhere on this blog.

Coincidentally, Becker was former Delaware County Assistant County Attorney and DSS Attorney, Miller's longtime personal friend.

As soon as the 4th Department saw the witness list, it quickly rescinded the initial order of public hearing as soon as I presented a witness list of who I want to depose, 

sealed the proceeding, attempted to criminally charge me and lock me up for writing about it, cooked the transcripts, forbid me to invite the public to attend the hearings, and suspended me for 2 years in 2015 without a right for automatic reinstatement immediately after my publications derailed judicial election of Porter Kirkwood, a yet another Delaware County Attorney and now 6th Judicial District Executive appointing judges into my cases - not too crooked.  Word-search the name Porter Kirkwood on this blog, or look through blogs here, upper right corner, in September, October and November of 2015 about Porter Kirkwood. 

Mr. Miller - in full knowledge of the contents of my affidavit in Neroni v Mole - linked here, about what exactly Judge Becker did - cannot stop pointing his finger at my unlawful suspension - while t the same time being in full knowledge that the system is corrupt and that HE HIMSELF will never get even a slap on the wrist, even for spiteful doxxing of a child online, as he did for 5 years.

Since that grievance against Miller was filed on May 25, 2025, Attorney Grievance Committee for the 3rd Department notified me that it transferred the case to the 4th Department (where Miller's law firm is located), even though misconduct occurred within the 3rd Department.

Today, I checked the NYSCEF Document that was the subject of the grievance.  

Attorney Miller redacted the child's pre-adoptive and post-adoptive name, medical, mental and hospitalization information, heavily redacted, I must say.  

The redacted file is now viewable at Dana Scuderi-Hunter v Delaware County, EF2020-320, NYSCEF Doc. 27, page numbers 65-113.  

Clicking this link will take you, for free, to the official NYSCEF (New York State court system's e-filing archive), with the document opening and available for your review for free, just scroll down to pages 65-113.  

All of the blackouts on these pages were made after my grievance. 

 The unredacted file was forwarded to the Grievance Committee on May 25, 2025 as an attachment to the original grievance, and I still have it on file as my protection against Mr. Miller's retaliative accusation of untruthfulness, frivolousness etc.

After the initial grievance was filed, Mr. Miller went beserk and engaged in a retaliation spree, with the help of his powerful law firm, seeking sanctions against me and my husband at least 10 times from various courts in various cases.  

In a recent case, Mr. Miller sought sanctions against me specifically (among other things) for turning attorneys into grievance committees - without ever mentioning that what he is unhappy about is a DOCUMENTED grievance against himself that he had to act on, but was not - at least yet - publicly disciplined for, likely because of his firm's political and familial connections and, no doubt, monetary contributions of all kinds to the judiciary - including employment of judges' children.

I have copied Mr. Miller and his law firm with the new grievance I filed today so that next time he engages in a new round of retaliation he cannot disclaim knowledge of the grievance.

I am also publishing my full grievance about Mr. Miller online - the new and the old, without access to unredacted attachments, here.

ANY OTHER attorney, not representing the government, and not having political and familial connections that Mr. Miller's law firm h as, would have been disbarred for much less.

Just think about it - the child's private information was put online by Attorney Miller and remained online FOR 5 YEARS - before I pointed it out through the grievance committee complaint.

When you are filing on NYSCEF, before you hit "file", you have to affirmatively check a box - whether you redacted personal information from your filings.  Mr. Miller checked that box before filing, in full knowledge that he did not redact.

Spiting an adult - DSS Commissioner Scuderi-Hunter - by doxxing a child, this way, is unlawful.

It is in violation of a multitude of state and federal laws.

And yet, Attorney Miler's license remains intact and he has "no record of discipline".

WHY?  Because his law firm belongs to the brother of Chief Administrative Judge for upstate New York James Murphy?  Because the law firm buys enough favors of enough judges by employing their relatives and former law clerks?

Attorney licensing is supposed to PROTECT CONSUMERS, not - these kind of people.

And consumers - including minor children - sure need to be protected from Attorney Miller, or from the law firm that is covering him up and enabling him in his retaliation efforts against a whistleblower and her family (serial sanctions applications, loss of employment by my adult child, punitive taxation of our properties, conditioning court appearances on impossible 1,700 mile travel, seeking to physically destroy my husband and physically harm me - what's next?).

Today, I made a simple check on Google as to whether doxxing is legal in New York - and that's what Google AI spat out:

And yet - a confirmed - but politically connected - spiteful online doxxer of a minor child is not yet disbarred, but is actively supported by the court system and his law firm, familially connected to the top management of federal and state courts in his retaliation spree against the whistleblower and her family.

Once again - WHY?