Courts invented for themselves a "presumption of integrity" of judges.
Well, that presumption, which is a laughable matter to begin with because judges ALSO created FOR THEMSELVES the doctrine of absolute judicial immunity FOR MALICIOUS AND CORRUPT ACTS (which cancels any presumptions of integrity in any mind not affected by a lobotomy) - again, this alleged "presumption of integrity" goes out the door when the judge recuses from a party's case.
In my experience, when a judge recuses from a party's case, he must recuse from all cases of the same party.
Logical? Fair?
There is case law indicating that a judge may not re-enter a case from which the judge recused, it is a due process violation making every decision of that judge void.
And, Judges John F. Lambert and Brian D. Burns, when recused from my cases (even though they did not have to - they recused because of federal lawsuits where I was not a party and where they were named in their official capacity only, on issues of constitutionality of statutes, not because they did anything wrong), they recused from ALL cases in ALL courts at the same time, and never came back on any cases. That is what I call integrity.
Yet, judges I will enumerate below in a table in this blog decided differently. I encourage you to word-search names of judges from the table in this blog, there is a "search" window on the left. I wrote about each one of them at length here, detailing their misconduct, with documentary evidence.
And all decisions that are now under review of my disciplinary court were made by disqualified judges who re-entered my cases after recusals. Federal courts rejected that argument without review based on the concept of judicial immunity.
Don't you think it looks a like a pattern and a policy of how New York State courts operate? And that federal courts help them operate that way?
And by the way - one of the appellate cases to be reviewed by the disqualified Appellate Division 3rd Department, and argued in front of this court by the court's own attorney (a disciplinary violation on both sides) is going to happen tomorrow. I made a motion to recuse - and got no answer so far. And, of course, I will not go for the oral argument tomorrow - I am not participating in this farce.
Yet, I got an answer on another motion to recuse - motion denied without an explanation, I will run it in a separate blog.
The case to be heard on appeal tomorrow involves the issue how the New York Department of Environmental conservation defrauds New Yorkers into paying fines and doing costly environmental remediation on their property when DEC has absolutely no right to do that - and yet, it continues to do that with the blessing of state courts, federal courts and the New York State Attorney General, who, instead of prosecuting fraud in the government, defends fraudsters in court.
I will shortly publish a separate blog about DEC fraud upon New Yorkers, with documentary evidence.
No.
|
Name of judge
|
Name of court
|
When recused
|
Reentered?
|
Recused after reentry?
|
1.
|
Carl F. Becker
|
Delaware County Family Court, Surrogate’s Court, Supreme Court
|
October 2009, Delaware County Family Court
|
Assigned himself to all my cases in
February 2011, in Delaware County Supreme Court (after I
complained about him to the Judicial Conduct Commission and asked to take him
off the bench)
|
Yes, in August of 2012, after sanctioning me for suing
him and referring his own sanctions to disciplinary authorities
|
2.
|
Kevin D. Dowd
|
Chenango County Supreme Court, Delaware County Supreme Court
|
In the fall of 2012 in Neroni v. Harlem (Delaware), but failed to recuse in Mokay v. Mokay, with
the same party, and claimed it was because of his policy of not presiding over cases of attorneys
appearing in front of him, but failed at the same time to recuse from a
Chenango case where I was a party
|
After I confronted him with inconsistent application of his policy, he
recused from the Chenango case, but failed to vacate parts of his decisions
that were against me
|
|
3.
|
James C. Tormey
|
Chenango County Supreme Court
Delaware County Supreme Court
|
Recused in Chenango County in the fall of 2013 from the
case where Dowd was the judge previously, but refused to recuse in Delaware
County and sanctioned me for making a motion to recuse
|
I qualify non-recusal from a Delaware County case after
recusal from a Chenango County case as a re-entry
|
No, sanctioned me for making a motion to recuse, for
bringing a federal case AGAINST HIMSELF, and referred the case to
disciplinary authorities
|
4.
|
Michael Coccoma
|
Delaware County Supreme Court, all upstate courts
|
2007, recused from Mokay v. Mokay
|
Michael Coccoma’s wife was part of the prosecuting team in the
disciplinary action of my husband, based on the case from which Michael
Coccoma recused – I consider that a re-entry by Michael Coccoma,
Michael Coccoma as the chief administrative judge of upstate New York continues
supervising assignment of judges to all cases involving me and my husband as
parties, despite requests to transfer all of our cases to downstate, outside
of the reach of Michael Coccoma and his direct subordinates;
Michael Coccoma assigned Judge Dowd (who is close to retirement and will
soon be eligible for financial post-retirement perks from Michael Coccoma) to
the case where Michael Coccoma’s wife was a private attorney and where I
requested sanctions against her – sanctions were, naturally, denied
|
|
5.
|
The entire court, Karen Peters as a presiding judge
(Karen Peters was a member of the Commission for Judicial Conduct that
rejected my documented complaints against Judge Becker and allowed him to
ascend to the bench of the Supreme Court)
|
Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
|
June 11, 2014
Recused from my disciplinary case and from the “case” of
my husband (he has no pending disciplinary case in that court, but was on the
caption of the order of transfer anyway)
|
Refused, without an explanation, to recuse from four more
actions (appeals) pending in the same court with me, my husband, or me and my
husband as parties.
All appellate cases involve decisions by similarly disqualified judges (Dowd, Tormey, Becker) regarding our property or reputation. So, AppDiv3rd ceded one case, but rounded up a protective wall around the 3 above judges |
No comments:
Post a Comment