I recently wrote about a case in North Carolina where a judge was prosecuted for misconduct both as a judge and as an attorney.
The judge claimed that he could not be prosecuted as an attorney, because he was already prosecuted as a judge. Yet, since maintaining a law license in good standing is a pre-requisite for a judge, and a judge adds rules of judicial conduct to rules of professional conduct of attorney when taking the bench, there is no law prohibiting to prosecute misconduct of judges both through judicial disciplinary authorities and through attorney disciplinary authorities.
A similar case is happening now in Ohio, where the Ohio disciplinary counsel is targeting with investigation a former judge for the judge's conduct on the bench.
Yet, in the blessed state of New York, attorney disciplinary committees usually refuse to prosecute judges as attorneys, claiming that they cannot prosecute a sitting judge, thus making the bench a sort of refuge for attorney misconduct of its occupants.
For example, I wrote on this blog about a complaint I filed in January of 2016 with the New York Commission for Judicial Discipline against judges that was nearly instantly dismissed without an investigation. The complaint was against attorneys-turned-judges:
1) Christina Ryba, and
2) Richard Northrup
I complained about their actions before they came to the bench, actions of them as attorneys.
New York does not have a statute of limitations for attorney misconduct.
Christina Ryba engaged in misconduct so bad that he was fired from her position as counsel for the Chief Judge of the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division 3rd Department for her unethical behavior and illegal and fraudulent use of the court system to rig her own judicial election.
Yet, the announcement of her being fired was not made in such a time to allow the rigging be known to the voters, and Christina Ryba was elected and took the bench, while her rigged election was paraded as "historic".
No attorney discipline followed against her, and the New York State Judicial Discipline Commission refused to prosecute her, even though she was fired for ethical violations - possibly, because a high-ranking judge known for his own misconduct, as well as for his preference for pretty-face female "special counsel", took her under his wing.
So, no criminal charges, no judicial disciplinary charges and no attorney disciplinary charges followed.
The same applied to judge Richard Northrup who rigged all criminal convictions in Delaware County from January of 2002 to July 31 of 2015 by failing to disclose that the Chief Assistant District Attorney he hired was the presiding judge's (Carl F. Becker's) law partner in private practice John Hubbard.
Now John Hubbard appears in front of Richard Northrup as an Acting District Attorney in front of a judge, even though these two have been now known of rigging cases for 13 years in the District Attorney's office.
Richard Northrup is also the one who refused to investigate attempted murder of a judicial critic Barbara O'Sullivan because the perpetrator was the nephew of Richard Northrup's long-time employee, and who instead filed rigged charges against the victim.
The New York State Commission for Judicial Conduct dismissed my complaint about both judges, without investigation, in April of 2016, within three months of filing at the end of January, 2016.
Yet, apparently, public pressure upon attorney disciplinary counsel and public outrage about rampant judicial corruption in the country has already resulted in changes in Ohio and North Carolina where attorney disciplinary authorities now dropped their unspoken and unwritten policy of not prosecuting judges for attorney misconduct and are doing it.
Not yet in New York, the stronghold of corruption, but - the wheels of justice are turning slow, but they are turning.
We can all here the screeching sound. It will happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment