THE EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL TYRANNY IN THE UNITED STATES:

"If the judges interpret the laws themselves, and suffer none else to interpret, they may easily make, of the laws, [a shredded] shipman's hose!" - King James I of England, around 1616.

“No class of the community ought to be allowed freer scope in the expression or publication of opinions as to the capacity, impartiality or integrity of judges than members of the bar. They have the best opportunities of observing and forming a correct judgment. They are in constant attendance on the courts. Hundreds of those who are called on to vote never enter a court-house, or if they do, it is only at intervals as jurors, witnesses or parties. To say that an attorney can only act or speak on this subject under liability to be called to account and to be deprived of his profession and livelihood by the very judge or judges whom he may consider it his duty to attack and expose, is a position too monstrous to be entertained for a moment under our present system,” Justice Sharwood in Ex Parte Steinman and Hensel, 95 Pa 220, 238-39 (1880).

“This case illustrates to me the serious consequences to the Bar itself of not affording the full protections of the First Amendment to its applicants for admission. For this record shows that [the rejected attorney candidate] has many of the qualities that are needed in the American Bar. It shows not only that [the rejected attorney candidate] has followed a high moral, ethical and patriotic course in all of the activities of his life, but also that he combines these more common virtues with the uncommon virtue of courage to stand by his principles at any cost.

It is such men as these who have most greatly honored the profession of the law. The legal profession will lose much of its nobility and its glory if it is not constantly replenished with lawyers like these. To force the Bar to become a group of thoroughly orthodox, time-serving, government-fearing individuals is to humiliate and degrade it.” In Re Anastaplo, 18 Ill. 2d 182, 163 N.E.2d 429 (1959), cert. granted, 362 U.S. 968 (1960), affirmed over strong dissent, 366 U.S. 82 (1961), Justice Black, Chief Justice Douglas and Justice Brennan, dissenting.

" I do not believe that the practice of law is a "privilege" which empowers Government to deny lawyers their constitutional rights. The mere fact that a lawyer has important responsibilities in society does not require or even permit the State to deprive him of those protections of freedom set out in the Bill of Rights for the precise purpose of insuring the independence of the individual against the Government and those acting for the Government”. Lathrop v Donohue, 367 US 820 (1961), Justice Black, dissenting.

"The legal profession must take great care not to emulate the many occupational groups that have managed to convert licensure from a sharp weapon of public defense into blunt instrument of self-enrichment". Walter Gellhorn, "The Abuse of Occupational Licensing", University of Chicago Law Review, Volume 44 Issue 1, September of 1976.

“Because the law requires that judges no matter how corrupt, who do not act in the clear absence of jurisdiction while performing a judicial act, are immune from suit, former Judge Ciavarella will escape liability for the vast majority of his conduct in this action. This is, to be sure, against the popular will, but it is the very oath which he is alleged to have so indecently, cavalierly, baselessly and willfully violated for personal gain that requires this Court to find him immune from suit”, District Judge A. Richard Caputo in H.T., et al, v. Ciavarella, Jr, et al, Case No. 3:09-cv-00286-ARC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Document 336, page 18, November 20, 2009. This is about judges who were sentencing kids to juvenile detention for kickbacks.


Saturday, March 21, 2015

Live shields of large law firms


Recently, federal prosecutors arrested and criminally charged New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on racketeering charges.

When that happened, the press, for a short time, focused on the law firm that hired Sheldon Silver and used him as a promotion tool and a live shield from any claims of impropriety.

Shortly after criminal charges were brought, the law firm took all associations with Sheldon Silver off its website.

Yet, hiring such "live promotion tools", as well as "live shields" from potential prosecution is a longtime policy of many large law firms in this country.

Every law student aspiring for a career in politics knows the steps.

He or she must first go work for either the Legislature, or a District Attorney, or, even better, clerk for a judge, as higher as possible - the best are federal Circuit Judges and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, but clerking for a state court judge or a federal district court judge is also not bad.

After that, you will have a "green light" to be hired by a large law firm.

Why?

Did clerking for a judge for a year or two enhanced your professional abilities so much?

Of course, not.

You did not try cases while being a clerk.

You did research, you drafted decisions (not necessarily correct decisions), and you definitely did not participate, nor could you, in the actual adversarial litigation.

But - what you acquired is even more priceless for future employment purposes.  Connections with a judge, a badge of approval by the judiciary (you were once a confidential, trusted person for a judge).

And those connections are what is sought when law firms are hiring, no matter that, of course, what is declared is that hiring is on the merits only and not to seek political connections.  Right.

I already wrote on this blog about hiring practices of several law firms - in particular, about Hiscock & Barclays, LLP, a receptacle of law clerks from judges of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of New York, while the firm continues to practice in that court, make local rules for that court, pick magistrates for that court and wine and dine members of that court through the American Inns of Court monthly receptions.

Here is another law firm BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, the law firm which, according to registration of Stephen D. Zayas, former (and disgraced) disciplinary prosecutor from New York State Appellate Division 3rd Judicial Department, embraced Mr. Zayas as one of their attorneys.

The "live shield" of this law firm is impressive.

There are close to 300 attorneys in several offices of this firm, across the country.

Nearly every third, if not second, attorney in this firm, worked in prominent positions in public employment at one time or another.

Nearly every third attorney in this firm clerked for a judge at one time or another, and thus it may appear that such attorneys still have certain courts' ears.

The firm counts among its 291 attorneys 7 attorneys, two associates and five partners, who worked as law clerks for eight justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, specifically, of the following justices:


  1. Justice Lewis F. Powell (in office 1972-87, deceased 1998) - partner David R. Boyd (1973-74);
  2. Justice Anthony Kennedy (currently in office, since 1988) - associate Greg Dubinsky (2013-2014);
  3. Justice Byron R. White (in office 1962-1993, deceased 2002) - partner Stuart H. Singer (1981-83), partner William T. Dzurilla (1982-83),
  4. Justice Paul Stevens (in office 1975 - retired in 2010) - partner Michael J. Gottleib (2004-2005)
  5. Justice David H. Souter (in office 1990 - retired in 2009) - Associate Ryan Y. Park (2013-2014)
  6. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (currently in office since 1993) - Associate Ryan Y. Park (2013-2014)
  7. Justice William H. Rehnquist (in office 1986 - deceased 2005) - partner Alan B. Vickery (1984-85)
  8. Justice Sonya Sotomayor (now in office since 2009 - clerkship was when Justice Sotomayor was a judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) - partner Lee S. Wolosky (law school summer clerk, undisclosed year)
 
The law firm also employs or has as partners former (often recent) law clerks of judges of ALL federal appellate courts, multiple district courts where the firm appears, multiple state appellate courts.

The law firm employs former federal and state prosecutors, former judges, hearing officers on the New York State Commission of Judicial Conduct, former advisors to administrations of presidents, to state and federal senators, former high-ranking members of state and federal agencies.

I will publish a detailed analysis, and full two-dimensional tables, in an upcoming book.  

Here is just the list of courts and judges of those courts where this law firm's partners or associates clerked:


United State Court of International Trade Edward D. Re, Chief Judge
U.S. Supreme Court Lewis F. Powell
U.S. Supreme Court Anthony Kennedy
U.S. Supreme Court Byran R. White
U.S. Supreme Court Paul Stevens
U.S. Supreme Court David H. Souter
U.S. Supreme Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg
U.S. Supreme Court Byron R. White
U.S. Supreme Court William H. Rehnquist
U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour
U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri Scott O. Wright, Chief Judge
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Morris E. Lasker
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Lewis A. Kaplan
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Charles S. Haight Jr.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Milton Pollack
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Kenneth M. Karas
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Milton Pollack
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Jed S. Rakoff
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York William C.Cooner
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Shira A. Scheindlin
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Jed S. Rakoff
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Barbara S. Jones
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Harold Baer, Jr.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Sonia Sotomayor
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Albin K. Hellersten
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Kathleen M. Williams
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida K. Michael Moore
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida James I. Cohn
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Lawrence King
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Federico A. Moreno
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Ursula Ungaro
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida James I. Cohn
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Donald M. Middlebrooks
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Alan S. Gold
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Donald M. Middlebrooks
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Federico A. Moreno
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Jose A. Gonzalez
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Norman C. Roettger, Chief Judge
U.S. District Court, Southern Disrict of Mississippi Carlton W. Reeves
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York Nichals G.Garaufis
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York Lawrence E. Kahn
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York Con G.Cholakis
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York Kimba W. Wood
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New Jersey Anne E. Thompson
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois Gary Feinerman
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois Gary S. Feinderman
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois Joan H. Lefkow
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia Newell Edenfield
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California Claudia Wilken
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana James Brady
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida G. Kendall Sharp
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia T.S. Ellis, III
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Norma L. Shapiro
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Marjorie O. Rendell
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Juan R. Sanchez
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Louis Pollack
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York Roslynn R. Muskopf
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York I. Leo Glasser
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York Steven M. Gold, magistrate
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York David G. Trager
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana Sarah S. Vance
U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands Curtis V. Gomez
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey Jose L. Linares
U.S. District Court, District of Nevada Lloyd D. George
U.S. District Court, District of Nevada Philip M. Pro
U.S. District Court, District of Maryland Frank A. Kaufman
U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii Alan C. Kay
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Gladys Kessler
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Charles R. Richey
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Charles R. Richey
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Henry H. Kennedy, Jr.
U.S. District Court, District of Arizona Mary H. Murguia
U.S. District Court, Central District of California Mariana R. Pfaelzer
U.S. District Court, Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez
U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Brett Kavanaugh
U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Ruth Bader Ginsburg
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Barry G. Silverman
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit John T. Noonan
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Pamela Ann Rymer
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Robert R. Breezer
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit A. Wallace Tashima
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Marsha S. Brezon
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Kim McLane Wardlaw
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Adalberto Jordan
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Michael Day Hawkins
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Stephen Reinhardt
U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit Donald R. Ross
U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit Frank Magill
U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit Richard S. Arnold
U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit Steven M. Colloton
U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit Pasco M. Bowman
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit Kenneth F. Ripple
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit Frank H. Easterbrook
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit Diane S. Sykes
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit David F. Hamilton
U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit Karen Nelson Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit Danny J. Boggs
U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit Gilbert S. Merritt
U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit Albert Tate
U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit John Minor Wisdom
U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit Edith Brown Clement
U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit E. Grady Jolly
U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit J. Dickson Phillips, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit Paul V. Niemeyer
U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit Harrison L. Winter
U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit Andre M. Davis
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Michael E. Chagares
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Anthony J. Scirica
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Marjorie O. Rendell
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit D. Brooks Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Joseph A. Greenaway
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Joseph A. Greenway, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Joseph A. Greenway, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Marjorie O. Rendell
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Chester J. Straub
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Joseph M. McLaughlin
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Robert Katzman
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Joseph M. McLaughlin
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Thomas J. Meskill
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Robert A. Katzman
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Jon O. Newman
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Chester J. Straub
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Wilfred Feinberg, Chief Judge
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Peter W. Hall
U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit Frank Coffin
U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit Jeffrey R. Howard
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Rosemary Barkett
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Peter T. Fay
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Rosemary Barkett
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Susan H. Black
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Thomas A. Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Rosemary Barkett
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit Charles Wilson
U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit Timothy M. Tymkovich
U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit William J. Holloway, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit Mary Beck Briscoe
U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit William J. Holloway
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Carl McGowan
Supreme Court NY County, Criminal Term Nardelli, Eugene L.
Supreme Court NY County, Civil Term Nardelli, Eugene L.
NYS Court of Appeals Robert S. Smith
NYS Appellate Division 3rd Department Edward O. Spain
Florida Supreme Court Raoul G. Cantero, III
Florida 1st District Court of Appeal Robert T. Benton
federal court New Orleans ?
federal court Miami ?
Court of Appeal, 2nd District of Florida Robert T. Mann
City of New York, Civil Court Nardelli, Eugene L.
Circuit Court of Florida, 17th Judicial Circuit Lester Langer
California Supreme Court Malcolm M. Lucas
NYS Appellate Division 1st Department Nardelli, Eugene L.
Alaska Supreme Court Craig F. Stowers
333rd District Court of Harris County, Texas James Halbach, Jr.


I would like to remind you the statistics.  80% of litigants in this country cannot afford an attorney.

Many states punish pro se litigants, who are often lack basic literacy skills, with "anti-filing injunctions" when they fail to perfect their pleadings in accordance to the arcane rules required by courts.

Many state and federal courts punish pro se litigants and represented litigants and their attorneys for raising sensitive issues of public concern, such as judicial misconduct and potential conflicts of interest with politically connected attorneys.

It is a well known fact that attorneys who are suspended or disbarred are predominantly solo and independent criminal defense attorneys and civil rights attorneys.

Once again, theoretically, the laws must apply equally to a Joe from the street and his solo private attorney, and to the big firm employing law clerks from all leading courts in the country.

Yet, do you have any doubt as to how courts would resolve claims of potential frivolous conduct against a law firm with such a "live shield", as opposed to a claim made by such a law firm against a solo attorney?

The mere hiring practices of large law firms, the hiring of high-ranking public officials from all branches of the government, and especially former clerks of courts where law firms continue to appear, raises clear issues of potential of influence and ex parte communications between such law firms and the courts, which undermines the trust in the rule of law.

I encourage you, ladies and gentlemen of the public, to go to websites of large law firms and to analyze publicly available information on backgrounds of attorneys in these law firms to verify conflicts of interest in pending cases.

Often, after such a review you may become unpleasantly surprised as to connections of your opponent's law firm with the court where you have a case pending.

And this is just the top of the iceberg, because nobody knows the familial connections between large law firms and the government, as names may be common or last names may differ between members of the same family.

I firmly belief that, where hiring practices of law firms, and engagement of attorneys in "judge screening", judicial discipline, judicial merit selection, judicial "advisory" committees, as well as in sponsorship of judicial education and "mentoring" activities that are accompanied with wining, dining, national and international travel (see, for example, my blog posts about the American Inns of Court), it is imperative to require judges to disclose to every litigant in every case the same information as a juror would have to be disclosing for purposes of background check for conflicts of interest.

Judges who consider that as too much of an invasion of privacy should not come to the bench.

Otherwise, "privacy" of judges cover backroom connections that do not come to light at all, or until after it is too late to undo irreversible harm done to litigants because of conflicts of interests.

Everybody is entitled to his or her own opinion.

To me, the hiring practices of law firms practicing in certain court, when the law firms hire law clerks of judges in that same court, is unsettling to say the least.




















No comments:

Post a Comment