A letter the NYS 6th Judicial District's "supervising judge" Christopher Baker sent to two disabled parents of an honorably serving U.S. soldier - in retaliation for my three recent blogs about him:
here,
here, and
here,
for anti-discrimination lawsuit against him
here, and
- in one of them, Judge Baker not-so-smartly-or-competently defaulted (and obviously blames it on me), and for a lawful a request for a disability accommodation:
Note that the judge represents that providing disability accommodations REQUIRED by mandatory federal law - Americans With Disabilities Act: specifically, allowing two invalids to appear in court remotely rather than be made to travel 1,700 miles roundtrip from South Carolina to New York for mundane motion hearings - as a big favor that he gave us as an exception (notably, he gave it to us only after I filed with the court the photograph of pools of blood from my husband's ruptured veins).
Notably, the judge pretended not to know of any other disability that we had - even though such disabilities were documented and filed with the court since 2023: he simply did not want to read.
And, obviously, the judge does not know that if he does not have enough information - regulations require him to SEEK it, not to deny accommodation outright - and in such a snotty way he did.
OK - we filed an administrative appeal for denial of disability accommodations.
Here it is - maybe, it will help somebody else, too.
I will publish any responses to this appeal. I am sure, Judge Baker - and other NYS judges - discriminated not only against us as disabled litigants, since NYS Court Administration disclosed to me in response to a FOIL request that NONE of NYS judges are trained in handling disability accommodation requests.
That shows, big time, in today's snappy disrespectful letter of "supervising judge" Baker - the one who got elected by telling electorate how he "served" the disabled
The hypocrites.
Polished. Sleazy. Incompetent. Uppity. Disgusting.
No comments:
Post a Comment