Attorney Gerard N Misk of Ginsburg & Misk has made a great "advertising" for himself and his law firm by having a lawsuit dismissed against him an embarrassing issue by two "former" attornets, one not even s native speaker of English. Good job, Mr Misk!

This is an update to my blog of December 9, 2023 about the interesting phenomenon of an attorney who - well, read, what he was doing.

And here is the result of his actions.

It happens, it happens.

The one who bad-mouths you in court the most - instead of learning, following and presenting to the court the governing law and solid evidence, had his rear end handed back to him by the judge on Friday, December 15, 2023, when the judge has dismissed the case against me and my husband, a (politically) suspended and a (politically) disbarred attorney.

The lawsuit was stupid to begin with - a purported corporation attempted to allege a so-called easement through our property.

I will not go into more details while the said corporation is rearranging its ruffled feathers and preparing - maybe - to sue us once again.

I wonder though whether the badmouthing Mr Misk will be there for the second lawsuit after so epically failing the first one.  I have a funny feeling that he charged his purported client an arm and a leg for his shenanigans (the purported client is the nasty woman Stephanie Carter Shaake Halberian of Delhi, NY, of the Blue Bee Cafe who has ratified, in writing, my abuse by Mr Misk in writing).

The fun part about her little "ratification" is that we, to a certain degree, gave a present to the sorry "attorney" Misk who can't tell the governing law and competent evidence from rumors, opinions, positions and beliefs.

Now the nasty woman Stephanie Carter will be unable to even sue the sorry excuse of an "attorney" Gerard N Misk (32 years of experience in law practice, mind) for his theatrical performances before the court instead of doing his job and arranging the service of the lawsuit on us in our state the way the law spelled it out for him in detail how to do.

But, attorney Misk does not read the law, considering it petty "ceremony", "games", and simply not available to us - that is what he was arguing to the court in writing, under the penalty of perjury - because we were stripped by the State of NY for being too good of litigators against the State of NY. 

I was not there at the hearing, Misk did cause a very precarious situation with my health,  but we still made our motions on submitted basis, the hearing, with Mr Misk appearing, happened, some of my friends appeared virtually as members of the public, for support and gave me their accounts.

The written decision will be published as soon as it is produced by the court.

Later I will publish the transcript of the hearing when I purchase it.

The "Misk fiasco" against 2, as he kept saying, "former attorneys" who were not even present at the hearing to oppose him clearly shows to the public that a law license has nothing to do with litigation skills or integrity of the lawyer.

BTW, Misk invented a word I will borrow for future use, how to term us since, by law, a disbarred attorney is not an attorney, and a suspended attorney is an attorney in the view of the regulator, but is not in the view of the criminal law.

Mr Misk just called us "experienced litigators" - but still did not prepare for a vigorous and well-researched opposition, firmly believing that "the system" will never let us win, no matter what.

Yet, there happened a judge who simply applied the law - could not believe it, did not hope for it, but it happened. 

The judge has dismissed the action, because Mr Misk could not arrange for service of the summons and Complaint of two sitting-duck elderly defendants whose addressm on an unfenced property on a public road in South Carolina was known to the nasty woman  Stephanie Carter Halberian for 8 years.

A profound waste of the purported client's, the court's, and our own time and resources.