Don't you think that this is very crass and disrespectful to all fallen our soldiers to have deceased justices of the US Supreme Court be buried in the national Arlington cemetery?
Working like kings and queens in the US Supreme Court, a very privileged uncomfortable position, does not come close to be compared to the hardships and sacrifice of military service and giving you life for your country, literally.
That's a travesty and a farce, and that should stop.
Having served our nation with grace and dignity for forty years, first on the US Court of Appeals and then as a Supreme Court Justice, and as the wife of a US Army veteran, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has every right to be interred at Arlington.
ReplyDeleteYou should be aware of this, and given that many of the rights you enjoy in this, your adopted nation, are a direct result of her rulings, you should be more respectful of her memory.
I'm writing under my real name. You're commenting anonymously, under a fake profile. Her husband could be a US Army veteran, but she was not. And let me be the judge of her input into rights that we enjoy in this country, and have started enjoying less and less with the shenanigans of Democrats over the last four years, and that includes egregious judicial misconduct of Ruth Bader Ginsburg that I wrote about on this blog. She should have been impeached, taken off the bench and prosecuted, not given the honor of being interreed in the Arlington national cemetery next to our fallen soldiers. The rights I enjoy in this country are not because of her but despite her. And I personally contributed a lot to protecting people's rights - to a lot more personal sacrifice than Ruth Bader Ginsburg did, so don't you dare sermonize to me on what rights I enjoy here. I talked to people who knew her before she founded the ACLU, secured for fascists the right to march through a village of Holocaust survivors and that's secured support from the extreme right to pave her path to the US Supreme Court. They knew her as a very mediocre legal aid lawyer in New York City and they do not believe that the decisions ascribe to her were actually authored by her judging by her abilities as a lawyer that they witnessed. Her supposed brilliancy in decisions is due only to having been written by brilliant unnamed law clerks from Ivy league law schools that slaved for her. Putting her name on those decisions is plagiarism pure and simple.
DeleteSo don't you dare lecture me that I need to respect a woman who does not deserve any respect, but richly deserved investigation and prosecution for her misconduct on the bench and for her criminal activities in fixing court cases against the Trump administration sued in his official capacity which means that when she was fixing court cases she was doing that against the American people, committing a federal crime.