Do attorney regulations apply to Hillary Clinton, lawyers working her and lawyers working to protect her, like Loretta Lynch and James Comey?

According to attorney Ty Clevenger (attorney who forced resignation of the sexual predator, federal judge Walter Smith, at the cost of exposing himself to retaliation by the D.C. bar), the D.C. bar refused to even investigate the disciplinary complaint against Hillary Clinton and her legal team for destruction of e-mails in violation of a court order.

South Carolina Rep. Tedd Gowdy publicly announced that Clinton's lawyers not only deleted several thousand e-mails from Hillary Clinton's server, but did that using software that prevents recovery, so the destruction of evidence was complete and deliberate.

Ty Clevenger also reported that disciplinary complaints were also filed against attorneys James Comey, director of the FBI, and Loretta Lynch, the U.S. Attorney General, and the complains were reportedly filed in New York State, where Comey and Lynch are licensed.

Of course, I wouldn't hold much hope that New York disciplinary authorities will be less corrupt than those of the D.C. bar - and especially because Hillary Clinton lives in New York State.

Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see how the complaints against Comey and Lynch will go through in New York, where, according to the new rules of attorney discipline, the complainant is now entitled to at least some form of appeal if the complaint is not investigated or dismissed.

The D.C. bar is followed, in its corruptness, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit that dismissed Ty Clevenger's disciplinary complaint against David Kendall, one of Hillary Clinton's attorneys, and threatened Ty Clevenger with contempt of court proceedings if he discloses the dismissal to anyone.

Well, Ty Clevenger disclosed that dismissal to the whole wide world by publishing an announcement about it on his blog, insisting, correctly, that it is a 1st Amendment issue and that the government may not order him into silence on this matter of public concern.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit is, in fact, very corrupt - and continues to hide the extent of how corrupt it is, by refusing to answer my Freedom of Information Act request for records of behind-the-scene meetings between state judges (defendants in civil rights actions before that court and federal district courts below) and federal judges deciding the state judges' cases.

There are claims that if Trump gets elected, it will be a disaster.

Will it not be a disaster if Hillary Clinton is elected and grants permission to all who protects her from criminal prosecution to be above the law?

If it is already happening now, imagine what kind of boons will be given out by Hillary Clinton to her "faithful" (to her, not to the law) supporters if she is elected.

Please, vote wisely.