Yahoo! NDNY Judge Lawrence Kahn CAN read, and be reasonable and fair - when it does not concern "the Neronis" and the judge's personal grudges

Yesterday I wrote about the Senior U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of New York Lawrence Kahn, that he really cannot read - not the record, not the docket entries in the record, because he treated a motion filed by my husband as filed by me, and decided it that way.

And, that Judge Kahn falsely claimed that I am disbarred in the same decision, which is not true.

Yet, it appears that Judge Kahn lost his ability to read, comprehend and produce reasoned decisions only 6 days ago - because as recently as on August 12, 2016, he produced a very reasoned and fair decision denying prosecutorial immunity (a VERY rare case) because, even though the pleadings did not make clear in which capacity the prosecutor acted, there was a reason to believe that the prosecutor may have acted in an investigative capacity, and thus would not be entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity.

Here is the decision in Brown v Oneida County, New York, and here is the complaint based on which Judge Kahn made his decision.

And, here is a decision of the same Judge Kahn dating back to September 2011, a very fair decision, striking as unconstitutional New York's "physical office" requirement for attorneys who live out of state, but not in-state.  The decision was overturned by the 2nd Circuit in 2016, but it is clear that it is Judge Kahn's and not the 2nd Circuit's decision, that was fair and based on the law.

So, Judge Kahn did have ability to read the record and reason - but abruptly lost that ability when his decision concerned his own misconduct (motion to recuse) in my own and my husband's motion, and when it concerned my husband's motion to vacate his prior decisions that became unvalid based on new court precedents.

It is "coincidental" that Judge Kahn falsely accused me of having been disbarred and falsely claimed that I, and not my husband, made a motion to vacate under Rule 60 at the very same time when he knows I am digging at his, and other judges' of his court, participation in the behind-the-scenes secret-membership organization the New York State-Federal Judicial Council, where information from that case may revive my lawsuit from 2014 against Judge Kahn personally, for his out-of-court activities and case-fixing.

See docket report of Neroni v Peebles.

See Amended Complaint in Neroni v Peebles.

See order of dismissal of Neroni v Peebles "as frivolous" and denying my request to recuse David Peebles the Defendant from presiding over the case as a judge - by a judge who is a witness (and, possibly, a participant) in the events charged in the lawsuit who was since elevated to the position of the Chief Judge of that court.

Maybe, after reading that lawsuit, it will become clear why my disciplinary case was transferred from 3rd to 4th Department based on an ex parte court order, and why I was suspended from the practice of law - as an attorney from Syracuse, Woodruff Carroll, recently said in a sworn statement to the court, I was suspended for "suing everybody who is anybody".  Not that that, political, motivation of my suspension was reflected in my disciplinary proceedings.

So - Judge Kahn can actually read.  He is just corrupt and prone to disregard the law when he is bent on personal retaliation, not demented - I don't know whether that is any relief for those appearing in front of him.