Wednesday, April 13, 2016

The difference between pocketing criminal fines and not exonerating bail - it is "judicial discretion", baby

On April 11, 2016 it has been reported that a North Texas judge is sentenced to two years in federal prison for pocketing fines paid by several criminal defendants.

Nice.

In New York, judges, if caught in such a thing, are never criminally prosecuted, because - ask John Hubbard who is currently running for the position of Delaware County District Attorney and who did not disclose, in 15 years of prosecuting cases in front of a judge, Carl Becker, that he is Carl Becker's former associate, and then law partner.

Hubbard and his boss Northrup refused to prosecute Becker for the commission, with two accomplices, of an apparent E-felony and grand larceny from the State of New York taxpayers.

Because his boss wanted to become a judge.

And Hubbard wanted to take his boss's place.

And one of the accomplices was the Republican Commissioner of the Board of Elections.

You know.  

One does not bite a hand that may at some point in the future feed you and promote you.

Ok, so that was about a North Texas judge pocketing fines.

What about a New York judge who does not exonerate bail?

Out of a felony case that was dismissed - and sealed - nearly 2 months ago?

A $10,000 bail?

That's Judge John F. Lambert who is, according to the court clerks, as I am told, is extremely busy and cannot get his hands on issuing such an order.

I guess, that is not theft.

That is - what do they call it - "judicial discretion"?

Or, rather a not-so-subtle attempt to continue to punish Barbara, and the extended family who bailed her out of jail where she was put on an illegal warrant of Judge Gumo who, Judge Lambert himself said, was "either confused or disingenious" in his testimony - in other words, he lied under oath, and that's a crime of perjury.

And John Hubbard - remember - does not prosecute judges.

For public good.

So Hubbard does not prosecute Gumo for public corruption.

And he will never prosecute Lambert for public corruption - because he appears in front of him and hopes to get favorable dispositions from that judge.

"#PublicServants", all of them.

Becomes a swear word, doesn't it?

And another question - since the charges were illegal, and incarceration was illegal, maybe, the bail was illegal, too - and maybe, the Delaware County Treasurer should not charge a percentage on that bail, but release it whole, with accrued interest that the State of New York requires for money judgments - 9% a year?

It would be what - $10,000 put in by Barbara's family, $10,900 to be returned - and $900 to be obtained from Gumo, as compensation for his criminal conduct?

Yes?

No?

What will be the input of the ardent public servant John Hubbard on this one?








No comments:

Post a Comment