Is judicial candidate, Delaware County DA Richard Northrup, going to knowingly introduce false evidence at an upcoming criminal trial? Looks that way.

I have come into possession of documentary evidence supplied by Delaware County District Attorney's office in pretrial discovery in a criminal case.

I also have come into possession of another piece of documentary evidence that the other piece of documentary evidence was falsified to match the evidence to the elements of the crime charged.

There is no doubt in my mind, after comparing two pieces of documentary evidence, that Richard Northrup knows that the contents of the second-in-time documentary piece was falsified.

When a piece of evidence is provided in discovery, especially in a criminal case, more than likely it is going to be introduced at trial.

Moreover, without the falsified evidence, the trial in question cannot be won, as otherwise evidence is insufficient for conviction, and it is apparent that DA Northrup knew it from the very beginning, when he sought the indictment and when he vigorously prosecuted it.

I will be closely watching the course of the criminal trial in question.

As you know, evidence introduced during criminal trial constitutes public record.  Moreover, I already have a copy of that evidence in my possession, as released by DA Northrup in discovery, as well as proof that it was fabricated in order to secure a wrongful conviction.

In the event Richard Northrup introduces the fabricated evidence, I will petition state and federal authorities for his investigation and prosecution for a felony, as well as his immediate disbarment.

I will similarly petition state and federal authorities to investigate, prosecute, take off the bench and disbar the presiding judge if he allows introduction of the clearly falsified evidence in order to convict the criminal defendant that the judge has a clear bias against, but has so far failed to step down.

If Northrup wants the Duke LaCross prosecutor's fame, he'll get it.

Stay tuned.