I received today a spectacular letter from my disciplinary court.
The letter was dated February 11, 2015.
In the letter, "Principal Appellate Court Attorney" Christopher D. Lindquist practically gives the Grievance Committee legal advice as to how to bring a contempt proceeding in the court so that it can successfully proceed.
The court did not just reject an improperly commenced proceeding.
The court advised the Grievance Committee how to cure the defect to allow the proceeding to be "calendared" and to go forward.
The letter also mentions discussions "earlier" the day when the letter was written, and, judging by the content of the letter, the discussions were specifically on how to help the Grievance Committee cure any defects of filing.
That is an ex parte communication, pure and simple.
But - lo and behold - I am not even allowed to make a motion as of right after the court blatantly acknowledged the ex parte communication in a letter, because the court self-servingly imposed upon me an anti-filing injunction, and failed to respond to my letter politely requesting the court to, please, allow me to make a motion against the court to remove the court for bias and misconduct.
It is obvious that I can obtain no fair ajudication in this court... Nor anybody else can.
If the rule of law and equal protection of law is dead as to me, it is dead as to everybody else.
No comments:
Post a Comment