When incompetence of a prosecutor is a jeopardy to the public

Mary Gasparini, while advancing CRIMINAL charges against me, asked the court to drop the burden of proof in those criminal proceedings to "by reasonable certainty", a standard Ms. Gasparini borrowed from CIVIL contempt proceedings.

And, while advancing against me allegations of conduct qualifying as a Class A (by the fine) or unclassified (by the term of incarceration) misdemeanor, Ms. Gasparini wants a secret, summary criminal proceeding without a jury, obviously to the standard of proof of civil contempt proceedings.

I am turning Mary Gasparini into disciplinary authorities as well as criminal authorities for appropriate investigations and prosecutions.

As to disciplinary authorities, they are, coincidentally, Mary Gasparini's office itself, because there is no other governmental body to turn her into for attorney discipline.

It is interesting, will Mary Gasparini as a disciplinary prosecutor, prosecute Mary Gasparini for her own incompetence and abuse of power?

Stay tuned...